조선시대 사림의 서원건축 재해석: 기호학파 서원에의 가치부여
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국건축역사학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 건축역사연구 / 16권 / 6호
ㆍ저자명 : 이희봉, 손봉균
ㆍ저자명 : 이희봉, 손봉균
영어 초록
Seowon(書院) is a representing institution in Choseon Dynasty not only educationally but also politically and economically. Due to the artificial crackdown by Daewon-gun in 1871 and destruction by wars, it is difficult to restore and interpret the Seowon accurately at present. It is well known that the 'Basic Form' of the Seowon consists of an inner court, enclosed by the rear gangdang (lecture hall), dongseo-jae (east and west dormitory), and the front munlu (gate pavilion or upper story bower for relaxation), represented by so called 'front-dormitory rear-lecture-hall type', that is, 'jeonjae hudang(前齋後堂) type'. However, it is overlooked that this Basic Form is a product of Youngnam School located only in Youngnam area. A different form, of 'front-lecture-hall rear-dormitory type', or 'jeonndang hujae(前堂後 齋) type' is located only in Gyeonggi, Hoseo and Honam area. It has been wrongly analyzed that the type is a result of the later period, emphasizing the memorial service rather than the lecture itself, and worshipping loyalists than Confucian scholars. Analysis encompassing each Seowon architecture has been mistakenly made by historians as "deterioration" of the original educational purpose of the Seowon from the early period to the later period. This paper raises the fact that the form of jeondang hujae type has been established since the early period of Seowon in the 16th Century. It has a unique order of space itself. Here, the lecture hall faces toward sadang (shrine). The inner court, enclosed by east and west jae and the lecture hall, becomes the outer yard of the shrine, and as a result two main spaces of the shrine and lecture area is merged into one. While the munlu of the basic type encloses the inner court of the main area, the munlu of jeondang hujae type is located at the vicinity area. This paper reinterprets the jeondang hujae type not as a form coming out of degenerated period but as a type that belongs to a different Confucian school, the area of Kiho, and concludes that the Seowon is a product of political struggles between the two schools and of the local economical situation. Each school has maintained his own type of form, therefore the remaining Kiho Seowon architecture can be reevaluated.참고 자료
없음"건축역사연구"의 다른 논문
- 고려중기 慧照國師의 對北宋 交流와 轉輪藏 도입20페이지
- 조선시대 목조건축 도리와 보의 결구방법에 관한 연구14페이지
- 조선 궁궐, 東朝의 상징성과 17~18세기 대비전 조영에 관한 연구20페이지
- 조선시대 라마계 천왕문의 수용 및 전개에 대하여 -천왕문의 배치와 사천왕 배열에 관한 문제-20페이지
- 英祖初年의 全州邑城 改築工事에 관한 再考察20페이지
- 실상사 목탑의 복원 연구20페이지