Active Debris Removal: Potential Legal Barriers and Possible Ways Forward
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 이준국제법연구원
ㆍ수록지정보 : Journal of East Asia and International Law / 9권 / 2호
ㆍ저자명 : Jinyuan Su
ㆍ저자명 : Jinyuan Su
목차
I. Introduction: The Need for Active Debris RemovalII. Potential Legal Barriers
A. The Lack of A Legally Binding Definition of Space Debris
B. Possible Infringement upon Other States’ Sovereign Jurisdictionor Ownership
C. Possible Liability for Damage Caused in ADR Operations
D. The Implications for Space Arms Control
III. Possible Ways Forward
A. International Coordination in Tracking and Cataloguing SpaceDebris
B. Voluntary, Delegated, and Un-consented Removal
C. An International Debris Removal Fund
D. Space Arms Control and International Cooperation
IV. Conclusion
영어 초록
The space environment is unique. Natural decay of debris therein is much slower than pollutants in other environments, so that removal is difficult and expensive. Despites the voluntary implementation of mitigation guidelines, the amount of debris has surged in the last two decades due to increase and diversification of space actors, and the continuing militarization of space. Active Debris Removal has thus become a promising responsive scenario. This article examines key legal barriers to the implementation of removal, such as the lack of legal definition of space debris, ambiguities surrounding the jurisdiction and control over space debris, liability for possible damages caused in removal, and implications for space arms control. It further proposes that more comprehensive registration of space objects, an international catalogue of space debris and an international fund for removal should be promoted. Also, international cooperation should be enhanced to cope with space debris, while space arms control should be strengthened.참고 자료
없음"Journal of East Asia and International Law"의 다른 논문
- The ‘All Okinawa’ Movement: Political and Legal Implica..14페이지
- A Long Road to Brexit: How Britain came to leave the EU11페이지
- The Restrictive Immunity Doctrine and Employment Claims..20페이지
- The Sino-Philippine Arbitration on the South China Sea ..18페이지
- Taiwanese Position in the South China Sea Dispute: Befo..12페이지
- Problematic Expansion on Jurisdiction: Some Observation..17페이지
- The 2014 Enabling Law of the Myanmar National Human Rig..21페이지
- MNCs under International Climate Change Regime: Recogni..24페이지
- Sovereignty and National Civil Procedure: An Analysis o..18페이지
- Engineering Compulsory Food Safety Liability Insurance ..20페이지