* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국미술연구소
ㆍ수록지정보 : 美術史論壇 / 38권
ㆍ저자명 : 오진경
ㆍ저자명 : 오진경
영어 초록
If the most prominent features of a work of art happen to be elements of machine-based mass production, i.e., standardization, repetition and replication, this is likely because, in whatever respect,the work reflects an aestheticrelated to the culture of mechanization. This paper examines the works of Futurists, Purists, Dadaists and of Fernand Léger, in order to explore the meaning of the replication in Pop within the larger context of art history. In the early twentieth century, artists thought of replicationas either a weapon against the arrogance and parochilaism of previous generations, or a strategy to transcend the traditional notion of art as bound by a hierarchy and broaden the definition of man-made beauty. As part of a trend that had continued since the mid-nineteenth century, replication implicated the social significance of a new aesthetic not removed from daily life. This aesthetic of replication was succeeded bythe following generation of art movements including Neo-Dada, Pop and Nouveau Réalisme, and especially by artists in the United States. Raised in a culture of consumerism repsresented by an excess of mass-produced goods, photographs, advertisements and ready-to-eat foods, American artists were emboldened by the confidence that theirs could be the generation that establishes Pop as the most American form of art, and thus actively introduced increasingly commercial and replicated materials in their works. As did their previous generation in the 1910s, American Pop artists strived to express in detail the reality of a consumerist society where everything is reproduced and consumed, using replication as a means to challenge formalist modernism, which had pursued “art for art’s sake.” In this respect, they succeeded the perspective of Realists, who believed art should bear testimony to the spirit of the times. And while their blatent ordinariness make the works appear extremely apathetic and mechanical, ironically, it also allows the art to speak to the viewer in a more serious, piercing voice. Through the act of replication, without which the structure of consumerist societies cannot be explained, Pop art provided an opportunity to once again reflect upon the world we live in, raising the oldest, most fundamental question about art and aesthetics, “What does it mean to create art?”참고 자료
없음"美術史論壇"의 다른 논문
- 夫餘의 얼굴: 둥퇀-마오얼산 출토의 金銅 面具와 그 外延32페이지
- 統一新羅 佛敎彫刻과 唐代 畵風: 甘山寺 阿彌陀佛立像과 彌勒菩薩立像을 中心으로27페이지
- 조선 17세기 전반의 ‘假畵龍樽’25페이지
- 조선미술전람회 공예부의 개설 과정에 대한 고찰: 전람회를 통한 근대 공예 개념의 형성과 확산31페이지
- 고희동의 신미술운동과 창작세계30페이지
- 『東京朝日新聞』에 연재한 오카모토 잇페이(岡本一平)의 <朝鮮漫画行>(1927): 신문 만화에 그려진..15페이지
- 東京朝日新聞連載の岡本一平「朝鮮漫画行」(1927年): 新聞漫画に描かれた日本統治下の韓国10페이지
- 미스 조선, 근대기 미인대회와 미인 이미지26페이지
- 신문매체를 통해 본 한국 근대화단과 ‘南畵’: 용어, 작가, 그리고 단체25페이지
- 소에지마 미치마사(副島道正) 사장 시기 『京城日報』 미술 관련 기사의 양상25페이지