Responsiveness Comparisons of Self-Report Versus Therapist-Scored Functional Capacity for Workers With Low Back Pain
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국전문물리치료학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 한국전문물리치료학회지 / 19권 / 3호
ㆍ저자명 : Bongsam Choi, So-yeon Park
ㆍ저자명 : Bongsam Choi, So-yeon Park
영어 초록
The primary aim of this study was to compare responsiveness of self-report by worker and therapist-scored functional capacity instrument. Self-report and therapist-scored interval-level person measures and item difficulties were compared at admission and discharge. Therapist and worker ratings were collected on 230 clients from 27 rehabilitation sites using the newly developed Occupational Rehabilitation Data Base (ORDB) functional capacity instrument. ORDB comprises several subscales measuring relevant variables of "a return-to-work model" in work-related rehabilitation clinics. The functional capacity scale deals with 10 DOT job factors. The rating scale categories were 1-severely impaired, 2-moderately impaired, 3-mildly impaired, and 4-not impaired. Only data from clients with low back pain (n=98) with complete data (both admission and discharge scores) were used for the present study. Therapists and workers completed the functional capacity instrument at admission and discharge. Rasch analysis [1-parameter item response theory model (IRT)] was applied to calibrate item difficulty and person ability measure of therapist and workers ratings. Effect sizes for therapist and self-report ratings were slightly different, .69 and .30, respectively. Therapist and worker ratings were more consistent at discharge (r=.54) than at admission (r=.32). Workers have a tendency to be more severe in their ratings (show higher item difficulties) than therapists at admission and discharge. Therapists and workers report similar magnitudes of improvement following treatment program. These findings challenge the belief that injured workers may unreliable source for monitoring therapeutic outcomes. Self-report measures have the advantage of conserving therapist time for treatment (versus evaluation). While the therapist and self-report ratings are comparable at discharge, there is less consistency at admission. Comparable therapist-worker ratings may be achieved by controlling for rating severity using IRT methodologies.참고 자료
없음"한국전문물리치료학회지"의 다른 논문
- Computer Adaptive Testing Method for Measuring Disabili..8페이지
- The Comparison of Clinical Assessment Tools for the Foo..9페이지
- Comparison of the Muscle Activity of Lumbar Stabilizers..10페이지
- The Effects of Repeated Passive Movement of Different V..7페이지
- 트레드밀에서 뒤로걷기 훈련이 경직성 양하지 뇌성마비 아동의 보행에 미치는 영향: 사전 연구10페이지
- 익숙한 운동과 새로운 운동이 뇌내 출혈 흰쥐의 운동기능에 미치는 효과 비교9페이지
- 휴대전화 이용이 자세조절에 미치는 영향11페이지
- 지지조건에 따른 시각되먹임이 뇌손상환자의 일어서기 과정 동안 자세조절에 미치는 영향11페이지
- 수동 견갑골 거상 검사에 따라 분류된 경부통 환자의 견갑골 안정화운동 효과 비교10페이지
- 하승모근 등척성 운동방법에 따른 근두께 변화량 비교 및 초음파 영상의 신뢰도 연구9페이지