영재교육원 수료 학생에 대한 과학고등학교 정원 외 선발의 타당성 분석

저작시기 2004.01 |등록일 2015.03.25 파일확장자어도비 PDF (pdf) | 24페이지 | 가격 3,000원
다운로드
장바구니관심자료
상세신규 배너

* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.

서지정보

발행기관 : 한국영재학회 수록지정보 : 영재교육연구 / 14권 / 4호
저자명 : 전영석

목차

I. 서론
II. 영재교육원 수료자 선발과정
III. 학업 성취도 분석
IV. 선호하는 과학 수업 형태 및 수업 환경 조사
V. 정의적 영역에 대한 분석
VI. 다른 전형과정을 통해 선발된 영재교육원 수료자의 성취도
VII. 사례 연구 - 한성과학고등학교 영재교육원 출신자의 진학 현황
VIII. 결 론

한국어 초록

We analyzed the validity of Science Highschool's selection process for the
students from Science Gifted Education Center in order to suggest the
direction of improvement. First of all, we invested the students'
achievement in Mathematics and Science. As a result, we found that the
students are not so good at mathematics and science through the selection
process for the students from Science Gifted Education Center. However
the difference is not statistically meaningful. On the contrary, The
achievement of the students from Science Gifted Education Center is above
average who were selected through the other course, e. g. the students
who acquired the recommendation of principal, winner of prize in Olympiad
of Mathematics or Science.
We didn't find any meaningful result in the investigation of Affective
Domain in Science. And then we found that the students prefer the
generous environment through the selection process for the students from
Science Gifted Education Center.
As a whole, the selection process for the students from Science Gifted
Education Center was not so satisfying. It should be reformed; we should
examine the students' portfolio on the activities in the Science Gifted
Education Center, and the entrance examination should include both
divergent and convergent problems to find out the students' creativity. And
the 3 dimensional process is also essential through the multiple steps.

영어 초록

We analyzed the validity of Science Highschool's selection process for thestudents from Science Gifted Education Center in order to suggest thedirection of improvement. First of all, we invested the students'achievement in Mathematics and Science. As a result, we found that thestudents are not so good at mathematics and science through the selectionprocess for the students from Science Gifted Education Center. Howeverthe difference is not statistically meaningful. On the contrary, Theachievement of the students from Science Gifted Education Center is aboveaverage who were selected through the other course, e. g. the studentswho acquired the recommendation of principal, winner of prize in Olympiadof Mathematics or Science.We didn't find any meaningful result in the investigation of AffectiveDomain in Science. And then we found that the students prefer thegenerous environment through the selection process for the students fromScience Gifted Education Center.As a whole, the selection process for the students from Science GiftedEducation Center was not so satisfying. It should be reformed; we shouldexamine the students' portfolio on the activities in the Science GiftedEducation Center, and the entrance examination should include bothdivergent and convergent problems to find out the students' creativity. Andthe 3 dimensional process is also essential through the multiple steps.

참고 자료

없음
  • 구매평가(0)
  • 구매문의(0)
      최근 구매한 회원 학교정보 보기
      1. 최근 2주간 다운받은 회원수와 학교정보이며
         구매한 본인의 구매정보도 함께 표시됩니다.
      2. 매시 정각마다 업데이트 됩니다. (02:00 ~ 21:00)
      3. 구매자의 학교정보가 없는 경우 기타로 표시됩니다.
      4. 지식포인트 보유 시 지식포인트가 차감되며
         미보유 시 아이디당 1일 3회만 제공됩니다.

      찾던 자료가 아닌가요?아래 자료들 중 찾던 자료가 있는지 확인해보세요

      더보기
      상세하단 배너
      우수 콘텐츠 서비스 품질인증 획득
      최근 본 자료더보기
      상세우측 배너
      영재교육원 수료 학생에 대한 과학고등학교 정원 외 선발의 타당성 분석
      페이지
      만족도 조사

      페이지 사용에 불편하신 점이 있으십니까?

      의견 보내기