(A+)테크놀러지의 철학적이해_기말 레포트

소개글

"(A+)테크놀러지의 철학적이해_기말 레포트"에 대한 내용입니다.

목차

1. Explain what both “deontology” and “consequentialism” would say about the “anti-senescence” technology. And what is YOUR opinion?
2. What would Michael Sandel, the author of “The Case against Perfection,” and Julain Savulescu, the author of “New Breeds of Humans” say about this news? How would you evaluate their positions?

본문내용

1. Explain what both “deontology” and “consequentialism” would say about the “anti-senescence” technology. And what is YOUR opinion?
1-(1) What would the deontologists say?
Deontological ethics, which states that actions based on innate obligations are inherently more ethical than consequently right actions, places more importance on the motives of actions than on the consequences of actions. Based on this, those with a deontological view will argue that anti-senescence technology is an act that harms human dignity, because it goes against the natural order by manipulating cells using advanced technology. Human life has an ontological value that cannot be converted into numbers by arithmetic calculations, so they would say that it is ethically wrong to arbitrarily increase it.

참고 자료

없음