흉악범의 얼굴공개에 관한 영문 레포트 (logical writing) 입니다

소개글

흉악범의 얼굴공개에 관한 logical writing입니다. 총 8page, 2800단어 가량 되며
1. intro / 2.body / 3. conclusion 세 부분으로 나뉘어 짜임새 있게 쓴 글입니다.
여타 쉽게 구할 수 있는 레포트와는 그 수준의 퀄리티가 다름을 강조드립니다. (주석도 있습니다)
가격만큼의 값어치를 한다고 생각합니다.
다른 영문 레포트 쓰실 때 해당 logic을 활용하시기에도 좋습니다.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
1.The object of the study
2.Introduction of the topic
① Background of legislation
② Response of the public
③ Process of Legislation

Ⅱ. Body
1.Arguments in favor of naming and shaming
① Enhanced social security
② Citizens’ right to know
③ Right of potential victims
2.Arguments against naming and shaming
① Imputation of responsibility
② Counter effect
③ Deprivation of criminal’s right
3.Analysis
① Question to the advocates of the law: Is it really effective?
② Question to the opponents of the law: Is criminals more important than the victim’s right?

Ⅲ. Conclusion

본문내용

When it comes to the legislation of a new law, there is always a conflict in opinion between people who support it and oppose it. On the surface, those conflicts in opinion regarding each issue do not seem to have any relationship between each other. However, when we analyze what is inside those conflicts, we can find out that most of those conflicts related to legal issue have the same inner structure; that is the conflict between public welfare and individual’s right. Laws that are legislated to maintain public welfare is often criticized for its possibility to violate individual’s right. On the other hand, laws that are legislated to maximize the right of each individual are often concerned for its possibility to harm social order.
The controversy over naming and shaming is an issue which represents the inner conflict between public welfare and the individual’s right. People who support naming and shaming are aware of the fact that rights of criminals can be deprived due to the legislation of naming and shaming.

참고 자료

Lee Woo-seung, Segye Daily, Atrocious crime is increasing, 2008.3.21, <http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=102&oid=022&aid=0001948287>
John Carvel, Megan's law won't work, Reid warned, 2006.6.22 <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2006/jun/22/children.ukcrime>
Kim Sang-hoon, ‘After the enactment of the Megan’s Law, did the number of sexual crimes in the USA decreased?’, Korean Weekly, 2009.12.17,
<http://koreaweeklyfl.com/news/cms_view_article.php?aid=7834&sid=5321d533b4517e98dfead9c830b39d20>
‘The photo of atrocious criminal is actually being revealed to public’, Naver Blog, <http://blog.naver.com/sesskgud?Redirect=Log&logNo=100063140724>