미국 무역확장법 232조를 근거로 한 미국의 관세부과조치에 대한 국제법적 정당성
- 최초 등록일
- 2019.04.15
- 최종 저작일
- 2018.02
- 17페이지/
MS 워드
- 가격 3,000원
목차
I. Introduction
II. Section 232 of the 1962 U.S. Trade Expansion Act
(1) Sequence of Trump’s action under Section 232
(2) Enactment background of Section 232
(3) Definition of Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962
(4) The process of a Section 232 investigation
(5) Substantive criteria to be addressed in a Section 232 investigation
(6) History of Section 232
III. Security Exceptions under the GATT 1994
(1) Background of GATT XXI formation
(2) GATT Article XXI, Security Exceptions
(3) Interpretation of Article XXI
a) Article XXI (a): “to furnish … any information”
b) Article XXI (b): “take any action …”
c) Article XXI (c): “any action … under the United Nations Charter …”
IV. Verifications for legitimacy of Trump’s action
(1) Different meanings of “national security”
(2) A purpose of subject import
(3) In time of “war or other emergency” in international relations
V. Conclusion
본문내용
On May 31, 2018, President Donald Trump’s announced that they would impose tariffs on U.S. imports of steel and aluminum under Section 232 of the 1962 U.S. Trade Expansion Act. They will put a 25 percent of imported steel and 10 percent of imported aluminum on E.U., Canada and Mexico. Additionally, they will impose steel quotas to South Korea and import controls to Argentina and Brazil instead of exemption from a 25 percent steel tariffs. The main countries that is applied to Section 232 in order to keep the U.S. national security are the key allies of the U.S. Therefore, it is actually in the paradoxical situation where a broad base of the U.S. alliance could be damaged. After these unilateral proclamations by Trump, Canada and E.U. immediately announced billions of dollars in retaliatory tariffs on the US goods. Accordingly, international relations are currently caught in a whirlpool of sudden changes.
How can these situations be explained in the view of international rules?
참고 자료
없음
