파스칼의 팡세 비판 (영작)
- 최초 등록일
- 2012.11.25
- 최종 저작일
- 2012.05
- 3페이지/
MS 워드
- 가격 3,000원
소개글
파스칼의 팡세 비판한 내용입니다. a4용지 3장분량이구요 총 5개의 문제점을 지적하였습니다. (영어로 쓰여져 있습니다!!)
목차
없음
본문내용
In table, we choose two options; believe God or do not believe God. When God exist, believing God give us gain infinity positive because the life of after death is limitless. However People who do not believe God get misery punishments which go to hell when God exist. When God does not exist, we lose nothing both options. This opinion is very attractive because it is simple and easy understanding why we believe existence of God. However, Pascals argument has some seriously flawed.
In table, he begged the question that God’s attribute is just one. It is first problem. In his assumption, God is only judge people who believe God go to heaven and do not believe God go to hell. However, this assumption is not enough to right persuasion. We can think God will send good people to heaven whether we believe or not. Because it is unjustified which people who believe God but kill people (do something bad) go to heaven and people who do not believe god but help sick people (do something good) go to hell, atheists think the latter assumption is more persuasive.
참고 자료
없음
