식이섭취를 통한 농약폭로의 위해도에 관한 연구
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국식품위생안전성학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 한국식품위생안전성학회지 / 14권 / 2호
ㆍ저자명 : 이용욱, 전옥경
ㆍ저자명 : 이용욱, 전옥경
영어 초록
Limited information is available on the acceptability of Korean MRLs(maximum residue limits) and the health risk based on the pesticide exposure by food intake. The aim of this study was to evaluate TMDI(theoretical maximum daily intake) and EDI(estimated daily intake) for Korean by using MRLs, food intake, residue data, and correction factors, and compare with ADI(acceptable daily intake) in order to estimate the health risk based on the pesticide exposure. The study was performed in three steps. In the first step, the residual pesticides in each category of food were investigated using the pesticide residue analytical data(1995-96) from officially approved organizations and the analytical data for poultry was adopted from Korean food code method. In the second step, TMDI was estimated from MRLs and food factors, and was compared with ADI. In the third step, the effectiveness of each culinary treatment (washing, peeling, steaming, boiling, and salting) was evaluated and EDI was calculated using pesticide residue data, food factor, and correction factor by treatment. TMDI obtained from MRLs and food intake, and food intake was summed as 1,100.99 g, which was 79.1% of total consumption. The percent ratio of TMDI to ADI for 156 pesticides was mostly below 80% and only 30 pesticides exceeded the ADI. In particular, non-treated EDI from pesticide residue data and food intake was summed up to about 43 ug/day/capita, and the rank was procymidone(8.6 ug) $gt; malefic hydrazide(8.2 ug) $gt; EPN(3.7 ug) $gt; deltamethrin(3.5 ug) $gt; cypermethrin(3.0 ug). The treated EDI calculated from pesticide residue data, food intake, and correction factor by culinary treatment was summed up to 13.7ug/day/capita. The percentage of ADI was TMDI(79.74%) $gt; non-treated EDI (0.17%) $gt; treated EDI(0.04%), and the exposure level of Korean population to whole pesticides was below the level to produce health risk. Oncogenic risk of five pesticides used in Korea whose oncogenic potency(Q*) was known were assessed from TMDI and treated EDI. Dietary oncogenic risk for Korean was estimated to be 2.0 × 10^(-3) on the basis of TMDI, 8.3 × 10^(-7) on the basis of treated EDI. The oncogenic risk from TMDI exceeded the risk level(1 × 10^(-6)) of EPA, whereas the oncogenic risk from treated EDI and real exposure level was lower than that of EPA.참고 자료
없음"한국식품위생안전성학회지"의 다른 논문
- Budget 방법론에 의한 한국의 식품첨가물 사용기준평가 및 식품첨가물 9 종에 대한 이론적 최대섭..9페이지
- 홍화자 분획물이 사염화탄소 유발 간손상 흰쥐에서 지질과산화와 oxygen free radical 제..7페이지
- 사과 푸른곰팡이병의 길항미생물의 분리 및 동정5페이지
- 사염화탄소로 유발된 간손상에서의 효소 활성도의 변화로 본 홍화자 분획물의 간손상 보호 작용7페이지
- 수산자원으로부터 Human Low Density Lipoprotein(LDL ) 에 대한 항산화제의..7페이지
- 계육의 위생화 및 안전 저장을 위한 감마선 조사7페이지
- 일부 농약의 생물농축계수의 측정7페이지
- Gas Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry 를 이용한 식품보존료의 동시분..6페이지
- 포장지에 따른 건조 , 구이 , 조미김의 저장 안전성과 Chlorophyll 함량에 관한 연구6페이지
- T-2 toxin 이 흰쥐 혈청 중 지질농도에 미치는 영향5페이지