The two aspects of a nationalistic art in Greece, 1950~1960
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국미술이론학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 미술이론과 현장 / 4권
ㆍ저자명 : Miltiades M. Papanikolaou
ㆍ저자명 : Miltiades M. Papanikolaou
목차
The Historical and Political Setting“National Art”and “Greekness”, Two ArtisticObsessions of The inter-war Period
Bipolarity in Art and the Role of“ Abstractionism”in the Post-war Years
Faces of a“ Nationalist Art”Following 1950
참고문헌
Abstract
영어 초록
As it is known, during the Second World War Greece has fought on the side of theallies and the end of the war found the country on the winners’side. However, thestruggle for authority right after 1945 was merciless and extremely difficult, as well asdangerous for the course of the country to the future. The political powers were dividedbetween the legal authorities that were represented by the king and formed the exiledgovernment on the one hand and the part of the resistance teams and the rebels of the leftthat had a soviet friendly direction on the other. Thus, the start of a civil war was just a matter of time. It finally started in 1947 andlasted for more than two years. The consequences were disastrous for the country’seconomy and decisive for the future course of Greece. The national army prevailed withthe help of, mostly, the English. Royal parliamentary democracy was established with aclear political turn to the west, as a completion and adaptation of the Agreement of theGreat Powers at Yalta. Art had a ‘similar’route. Dipolar, contradictory: conservative choices on the oneside, and a will for pioneering inspiration and perspective on the other side. The‘dominate’trend was first evident in sculpture and mainly in the public monuments. Theirconstruction aimed mostly at the public propaganda and at the promotion of the sovereignideology. On the one side we have the public sculptures composed of faces of contemporaryheroes or leading figures of the civic war and the national resistance. On the other side wehave monumental statues mainly that appeal to a ‘public’outside of the country’s bordersand mostly of the north borders, where there are countries with a communistic regime, likeBulgaria, Serbia and Albania. Their subject is derived from the heroic events of the BalkanWars (1912-1913) and ancient historical figures like Alexander the Great as the Greek armyleader, his father, Philippos II and Aristotle, who was of a north-Greek origin. The political message is twofold: on the one side the ‘inner enemy’the communiststhat were defeated and the promotion of the new liberal social system and on the otherside the north neighbours, which not only represent the East Block, but they also conspire the history and the culture of the Greeks. This is the way how the ‘Cold War’was resultedin a full and totalitarian expression in art.참고 자료
없음"미술이론과 현장"의 다른 논문
- 2006 한국미술이론학회 국제학술심포지엄 “현대미술과 내셔널리즘(Nationalism and Art..6페이지
- 미군정의 문화정책과 미술, 1945~194826페이지
- 미국문화, 그 기로에 서서 — NEA(국립예술진흥기금)를 둘러싼 논쟁 중심으로24페이지
- 일제강점기 ‘전위미술론’ 의 전통관 연구 — ‘문장(文章)’그룹을 중심으로20페이지
- 1949년~1966년 시기 중국 선전화 연구 — 유화와 포스터를 중심으로28페이지
- 1930년대 상해의 모던[摩登] 여성 이미지 — 시각화된 복제미술을 중심으로17페이지
- 광복 후부터1950년대까지 한국에서 활동한 외국인이 본 한국미술22페이지
- 그리스 내셔널리즘 미술의 두 얼굴, 1950~196016페이지
- 현대 한국미술과 민족주의란 두 개의 얼굴36페이지
- 미술과 집단성9페이지