미군정의 문화정책과 미술, 1945~1948
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국미술이론학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 미술이론과 현장 / 4권
ㆍ저자명 : 안진이
ㆍ저자명 : 안진이
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말Ⅱ. 미군정 문화정책의 기본 방향
Ⅲ. 미군정의 문화정책
1. 문화행정 개관
2. 문화재
3. 미술
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
영어 초록
This study is about the cultural policy related to fine art under the U. S. Military Government in Korea(USAMGIK), from September 8, 1945, to August 15, 1948. Drawing on the previous studies of Korean art history in the ‘Liberation Period’, this study especially concentrates on intention, attitude and activities of the USAMGIK. Particularly the historical documents, stored at the National Archives at the College Park, Maryland, U.S.A., were valuable to do research on the cultural policy of USAMGIK. The cultural policy was subordinated to the political objectives of occupation that can be summarized to building a stronghold of anti-communism in South Korea. Under the U.S. Military government control, cultural matters were assigned to the Cultural Section, the Bureau of Education, which later turns into the Bureau of Culutre, the Department of Education. The Bureau of Culture dealt with matters of the ancient Korean art treasures and of the Korean contemporary art. USAMGIK reopened the Korean National Museum which had been closed by the Japanese since the World War Ⅱ period. After that, U.S. Department of State sent arts & monuments specialists to South Korea for investigating ancient Korean art and culture. Although some of the destructed art treasures were restored during the occupation, there were many negative cases including intentional destruction of historic sites or loot of art treasures by U.S. army. In contrast to their interest in the Korean antiquities, USAMGIK payed little attention to promoting the Korean contemporary artists and their arts. USAMGIK distrusted and suppressed the artists of leftism, while they kept good relations with the pro-American artists and the right-wing artists. In conclusion, the visual-cultural policy of USAMGK was mainly planned and carried out in order to preserve the national interest of the United States. This period produced long-term effects on the fine art and visual culture of South Korea, in terms of institution, policy, and reorganization of art community based on anti-cummunism.참고 자료
없음태그
"미술이론과 현장"의 다른 논문
- 2006 한국미술이론학회 국제학술심포지엄 “현대미술과 내셔널리즘(Nationalism and Art..6페이지
- The two aspects of a nationalistic art in Greece, 1950~..21페이지
- 미국문화, 그 기로에 서서 — NEA(국립예술진흥기금)를 둘러싼 논쟁 중심으로24페이지
- 일제강점기 ‘전위미술론’ 의 전통관 연구 — ‘문장(文章)’그룹을 중심으로20페이지
- 1949년~1966년 시기 중국 선전화 연구 — 유화와 포스터를 중심으로28페이지
- 1930년대 상해의 모던[摩登] 여성 이미지 — 시각화된 복제미술을 중심으로17페이지
- 광복 후부터1950년대까지 한국에서 활동한 외국인이 본 한국미술22페이지
- 그리스 내셔널리즘 미술의 두 얼굴, 1950~196016페이지
- 현대 한국미술과 민족주의란 두 개의 얼굴36페이지
- 미술과 집단성9페이지