예술과 문화의 영역에 대한 재고 - 문화의 타자 키치, 아직도 예술의 적인가?
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국미술이론학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 미술이론과 현장 / 5권
ㆍ저자명 : 김희영
ㆍ저자명 : 김희영
목차
I. 키치의 개념 형성II. 아도르노와 호르크하이머의 '문화산업' 비판
III. 벤야민과 로젠버그의 대중문화 수용
참고문헌
Abstract
영어 초록
Despite continuous efforts to redraw the boundaries between art and culture, the conventional concept of originality has persisted in approaches to the practice of contemporary art. In the discourse of originality, various forms of lesser arts that employ the method of replication have been referred to as kitsch, or “rear-guard,” the opposite of avant-garde. This categorization points to the contested issue regarding the oppositional relation between modernism and mass culture. With its easily accessible content and financial affordability, mass culture has become both an irresistible attraction and a most powerful threat to modernism. This threat has instigated a discursive system that has situated mass culture as a cultural other of modernism. Taking the marginalized category of kitsch as the area of contention, this paper examines a discursive repression of kitsch. It analyzes the conceptual framework that defends originality and autonomy in art and, conversely, degrades kitsch as an inferior and dangerous cultural category. Greenberg's concept of kitsch as a by-product of industrialization evolved into the criticism that advocates the autonomy of art. The Frankfurt School scholars, particularly Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer, practiced comparable cultural critiques. Focusing on mass culture such as film, radio, and television, instead of art works, they critically analyzed the system of mass culture and theorized the negative implications of the ubiquitous presence of kitsch. Some critics, on the other hand, perceived the growth of mass culture as opening possibilities in cultural development. Walter Benjamin and Harold Rosenberg asserted the socio-cultural dynamics of mass culture underlining the potential for continual transformation in reality and in the subject. They acknowledged that technological advances changed the condition of creation and enabled unmediated interactions between media. By scrutinizing conflicting views on kitsch, this paper intends to reassess arts that draw “the forces of the outside.”참고 자료
없음태그
"미술이론과 현장"의 다른 논문
- 마그리트 회화와 라캉의 주체론 - 응시, 세계와의 조우18페이지
- 파스큐라의 미술론38페이지
- Scaenae frons - 관객의 공간, 배우의 공간25페이지
- ‘가난한 연극, 가난한 미술’ - 그로토프스키 연극이론과 아르테 포베라25페이지
- 닌교자(人形座)와 다이쇼 시기(1920년대) 신흥미술운동21페이지
- 人形座と大正期新興美術運動19페이지
- 20세기 중국화 속의 연극 - 화가 관량(關良), 린펑멘(林風眼)을 중심으로12페이지
- 20世紀中國畵中的戏曲 - 以畵家羊良, 林風眼为例10페이지
- 중국 문혁기 모범극(樣板戱)의 시각이미지 - <紅燈記>의 혁명영웅상을 중심으로19페이지
- 인도네시아 현대미술에 있어서의 설치미술 - 미디엄과 사회적 공간을 위한 탐색4페이지