인도 차(茶) 위원회 대 장 뤼크 뒤송 사건-상표의 지리적 표시권 침해 여부에 관하여-
(주)코리아스칼라
- 최초 등록일
- 2016.04.01
- 최종 저작일
- 2013.05
- 13페이지/ 어도비 PDF
- 가격 4,500원
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 서울대학교 기술과법센터
ㆍ수록지정보 : LAW & TECHNOLOGY / 9권 / 3호
ㆍ저자명 : 김해마루
목차
I. 서론
II. 분쟁 배경
III. 지리적표시의 개념 및 보호규정
IV. 이 사건 국제재판관할과 준거법
V. 차 위원회의 원고적격
VI.‘ 다르질링’이지리적표시로보호되는지여부
VII. 지리적표시의 침해 여부
VIII. 결어
한국어 초록
차(
영어 초록
THE TEA BOARD v. Mr. Jean-Luc DUSONG is a case to the Tribunal de Grande Instance of Paris filed by the institution affiliated to the Ministry of Commerce & Industry under Indian law. DUSONG is the holder of the semi-figurative trademark consisting of the name ‘Darjeeling’ and the drawing of a teapot. The mission of THE TEA BOARD is controlling its geographical production zones, including the district of Darjeeling.The issues of the case are what the proper law is, whether ‘Darjeeling’ gets an application of protection as geographical indication before registration, whether THE TEA BOARD is standing tosue, whether using the trademark as publication of books, consulting agency which are not related to tea production also makes an infringement of geographical indication, etc. The court of first instance ruled against the plaintiff, but Paris Court of Appeal accepted the appeal of the plaintiff. Paris Court of Appeal found the infringement of geographical indication as the final outcome, however, it is interesting that the court seems to invoke not the exclusive right of geographical indication, but the general principle of civil law. The court seems to consider following reasons.THE TEA BOARD hadn’t registered the geographical indication when DUSONG registered his trademark. Moreover, categories of DUSONG’s and THE TEA BOARD’s have no relevance. Under Korean current law, registration is necessary requirement for geographical indication, so Korean court shall agree the infringement with similar reasons.
참고 자료
없음
"LAW & TECHNOLOGY"의 다른 논문
더보기 (4/9)