정맥주입 전문간호사가 삽입한 말초삽입형 중심정맥관(PICC) 사용 결과에 대한 후향적 분석
(주)학지사
- 최초 등록일
- 2015.03.25
- 최종 저작일
- 2004.01
- 10페이지/ 어도비 PDF
- 가격 3,000원
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 기초간호학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 기초간호자연과학회지 / 6권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : 박정윤, 박광옥, 백미경, 김세라, 권혜리, 양수진
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌
영어 초록
Background: Intravenous(IV) access is becoming an increasingly important part of health care today, The current chive for clinical effectiveness and cost-effective health care serves to increase the need for reliable vascular access. Venous access devices were developed to overcome problems associated with limited peripheral access and frequent venipuncture in patients with long-term therapy. Although the peripherally inserted central catheter(PICC) have become popular during recent years in USA, its procedure is rare in Korea.
Purpose : The goal of this study was to analyze the PICC inserted patient data by IV CNS intervention.
Method : A Total of 62 PICCs were inserted into 51 patients by the IV CNS during a 10-month period form November. 14, 2002, to October 2, 2002. Data was obtained retrospectively through chart review.
Result: The patient population included 34(54.8%) men and 28(45.2%) women, with a mean age 50.6 years. The main indication for PICC placement was to access vein in poor peripheral venous status(40.3%). The mean served interval for PICC insertions was 16.7 days (range, 2-61 days). The reasons for removal were completed therapy in 18 cases(29.0%), patient death in 13 cases(21.0%), and mechanical or functional PICC problem in 10cases(16.1%). The three PlCCs removed for presumed infection, and one had only positive tip cultures(0.2%).
Conclusion: PICCs are rapidly growing popularity and required an extended course of IV therapy.
참고 자료
없음