『죽도문제 100문 100답』의 ｢죽도도해금지령｣과 ｢태정관지령｣ 비판 일본의 ‘고유영토론’은 성립하는가?

서지정보

ㆍ발행기관 : 영남대학교 독도연구소 ㆍ수록지정보 : 독도연구 / 16권
ㆍ저자명 : 송휘영

목차

1. 머리말
2. 『은주시청합기』의 해석에 관한 문제
3. ｢죽도도해금지령｣에 관한 주장 비판
4. ｢태정관지령｣에 관한 반론 비판
5. 맺음말

한국어 초록

지난 2월 22일 일본 시마네현의 ‘죽도의 날’ 행사를 치루면서 독도홍보책자

영어 초록

Japan government distributed 100 Questions and 100 Answers on Takeshima Issue book on February 22 on the occasion of Shimaneken ‘Takeshima Day’ event. This book contracted distorted logic on Dokdo by ‘Japanese Inherent Territory Logic’ which persistently shouted after the foundation of Takeshima Issue Study Cub on July 2005. In reality, this 100 Questions and 100 Answers on Takeshima Issue selected and arranged questions clearly among various questions from netizen viewers on Web Takeshima Issue Study Group homepage. However, this answer keeps the logic which explain “Korea had not recognized Dokdo, and Oya·Murakawa families in mid-17 century recognized the island during their fishery work and establish territory right on Dokdo” This paper will criticize Japanese wrong theory of inherent territory logic of

참고 자료

없음