Ethical Issue in Cosmetic Industry -Animal testing (A+)
도라에몽박사님
다운로드
장바구니
소개글
In this report I will deal with the ethical issue of animal testing in cosmetic industry in detail. I will introduce each position of advocates and contrarians, then analyze their arguments mostly based on ethical theories I’ve learned in the class. Next, I will draw some recommendations mainly on economic reasons while clarifying my oppositions to animal testing. At the conclusion of the report, there will be an overall summary of the analysis and recommendation.목차
1.Introduction1)Cosmetic Industry
2)Ethical Issue in Cosmetic Industry: Animal Testing
3)Stakeholders of Animal Testing
4)Contents of The Report
2. Analysis: Arguments about Animal testing
1)Advocates of Animal Testing
2)Advocates: Further ethical analysis
3)Contrarians of Animal Testing
4)Contrarians: Further ethical analysis
5)Recommendations: more on practical reasons
3.Conclusion
1)Overall Summary
4.References
본문내용
One of the big issues in cosmetic industry is animal testing. Animal testing is any scientific experiment or test in which a live animal is forced to undergo something that is likely to cause them pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm ("What is animal testing? | Cruelty Free International", 2014). It usually includes injecting animals with potentially harmful substance, forcing animals to inhale toxic gases and so on. Animal testing has been widely used to develop products that chemically interact with the human body. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of everything from medication to cosmetics, as well as understanding how the human body works ("What is Animal Testing?", 2018). Animal testing has been a disputable issue for a long time not only because it is very cruel but also because they have been debated whether they are practically effective. In this report, I would like to talk about animal testing only in cosmetic industry in order to clarify the argument in of the report.참고 자료
Korea Health Industry Development Institute. (2017). Cosmetic industry analysis report 2017. Retrieved from http://www.khiss.go.krTOP 20 Global Beauty Companies. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.beautypackaging.com/issues/2016-10-01/view_features/top-20-global-beauty-companies-688974
What is animal testing? | Cruelty Free International. (2014). Retrieved from https://www.crueltyfreeinternational.org/why-we-do-it/what-animal-testing
What is Animal Testing?. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.aboutanimaltesting.co.uk/what-animal-testing.html
Consumer rights. BusinessDictionary.com. Retrieved May 31, 2018, from BusinessDictionary.com website: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/consumer-rights.html
Animal Testing In China: Required For Foreign Cosmetics Companies – Cruelty-Free Kitty. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.crueltyfreekitty.com/cruelty-free-101/animal-testing-china/
Ly, V. (2018). China's Animal Testing Laws - Cosmetics Sold vs. Made in China (2018). Retrieved from https://ethicalelephant.com/china-animal-testing-laws-cosmetics-made-china-vs-sold-china/
Jones, G., Cardinal, D., & Hayward, J. (2006). Moral philosophy (pp. 1-122). London: Hodder Murray.
Bovens, M. (1998). The quest for responsibility. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2005). The ethics of research involving animals. London.
Griffin, D., & Speck, G. (2004). New evidence of animal consciousness. Animal Cognition, 7(1), 5-18. doi: 10.1007/s10071-003-0203-x
Allen, C. (1998). Assessing animal cognition: ethological and philosophical perspectives. Journal Of Animal Science, 76(1), 42. doi: 10.2527/1998.76142x
Alternatives to Animal Testing. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/alternatives-animal-testing/
Langley, G., & Farnaud, S. (2010). Opinion: Microdosing: safer clinical trials and fewer animal tests. Bioanalysis, 2(3), 393-395. doi: 10.4155/bio.09.168
Animal Testing: What's the Alternative?. (2015). Retrieved from https://www.lushusa.com/story?cid=article_alternativ
es-to-animal-testing
Garattini, S., & Grignaschi, G. (2017). Animal testing is still the best way to find new treatments for patients. European Journal Of Internal Medicine, 39, 32-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.11.013
Nielsen. (2014). GLOBAL CONSUMERS ARE WILLING TO PUT THEIR MONEY WHERE THEIR HEART IS WHEN IT COMES TO GOODS AND SERVICES FROM COMPANIES COMMITTED TO SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY. NEW YORK. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/press-room/2014/global-consumers-are-willing-to-put-their-money-where-their-heart-is.html