자동차 실내 냄새유발물질의 채취방법 비교

서지정보

ㆍ발행기관 : 한국냄새환경학회 ㆍ수록지정보 : 실내환경 및 냄새 학회지 / 15권 / 4호
ㆍ저자명 : 김만구, 이현주, 정영림

목차

1. 서 론
2. 연구방법
2.1 시료 채취방법
2.2 냄새 분석방법
3. 결과 및 고찰
3.1 PET와 테드라 채취 주머니의 냄새유발물질 분석비교
3.2 PET 채취 주머니 내에서 시간에 따른 냄새유발물질들의 안정성
3.3 PET 와 알루미늄 코팅 PE 채취 주머니의 냄새유발물질 분석 비교
3.4 PET 채취 주머니와 캐니스터의 냄새유발물질 분석비교
4. 결 론
감사의 글
References

영어 초록

This study compared the stability of odor compounds in three different types of polymer sampling bags. Tedlar, PET (polyethylene terephthalate) and aluminized polyester bag were used. A sample was collected from the interior of a new automobile which was parked in an outdoor parking lot. It was found that the Tedlar bag showed lower stability for odor active compounds than the PET bag. Meanwhile, the PET bag had good stability for odor compounds compared to the aluminized polyester bag. The PET bag showed a stability for the molecules smaller than toluene that was comparable to the canister, but showed a lower recovery for molecules bigger than C7. The FID signal of the sample in the PET bag was reduced by 1.7times after 3days storage compared to 24 h storage. The number of detected odor active compounds was reduced by half, and odor intensity was also decreased by 2~3 degrees. Considering the factors of repeated use, usability and price, a PET bag covered with a black plastic bag was the most appropriate approach for odor sampling in an automobile interior.

참고 자료

없음