“假借字”及相關術語的同名異實關係研究
(주)코리아스칼라
- 최초 등록일
- 2023.04.05
- 최종 저작일
- 2017.08
- 14페이지/ 어도비 PDF
- 가격 4,600원
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 경성대학교 한국한자연구소
ㆍ수록지정보 : 漢字硏究 / 18권
ㆍ저자명 : 溫 敏
영어 초록
The article indicates that usually there exists no correspondence between the term and its conception illustrated by the case of loangraph and its related term orthograph. Different conceptions of contemporary Loangraph, namely, “diachronic usage relation”, “relation of form and meaning”, “prevailing usage in an era”, have inherited some views produced in the academic history, which includes Xu Shen’s loangraph of “benwuqizi”, Wang Yun’s “shengjie”, Duan Yucai’s “three changes” of loangraph, and Zhu Junsheng’s “three sources” of loangraph. By listing examples of misunderstanding and obscure caused by the different comprehension of the loangraph term, the article analyzes its objective linguistic foundation, stating that in the use of the term, the same conceptual meaning of the term should be taken as the criterion, otherwise it will constitute exchange barriers and cause unnecessary contradictions and arguments.
참고 자료
없음