* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국산업경영시스템학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 산업경영시스템학회지 / 40권 / 2호
ㆍ저자명 : 김경욱, 장성호
ㆍ저자명 : 김경욱, 장성호
영어 초록
One of the challenges facing precision manufacturers is the increasing feature complexity of tight tolerance parts. All engineering drawings must account for the size, form, orientation, and location of all features to ensure manufacturability, measurability, and design intent. Geometric controls per ASME Y14.5 are typically applied to specify dimensional tolerances on engineering drawings and define size, form, orientation, and location of features. Many engineering drawings lack the necessary geometric dimensioning and tolerancing to allow for timely and accurate inspection and verification. Plus-minus tolerancing is typically ambiguous and requires extra time by engineering, programming, machining, and inspection functions to debate and agree on a single conclusion. Complex geometry can result in long inspection and verification times and put even the most sophisticated measurement equipment and processes to the test. In addition, design, manufacturing and quality engineers are often frustrated by communication errors over these features. However, an approach called profile tolerancing offers optimal definition of design intent by explicitly defining uniform boundaries around the physical geometry. It is an efficient and effective method for measurement and quality control. There are several advantages for product designers who use position and profile tolerancing instead of linear dimensioning. When design intent is conveyed unambiguously, manufacturers dont have to field multiple question from suppliers as they design and build a process for manufacturing and inspection. Profile tolerancing, when it is applied correctly, provides manufacturing and inspection functions with unambiguously defined tolerancing. Those data are manufacturable and measurable. Customers can see cost and lead time reductions with parts that consistently meet the design intent. Components can function properly-eliminating costly rework, redesign, and missed market opportunities. However a supplier that is poised to embrace profile tolerancing will no doubt run into resistance from those who would prefer the way things have always been done. It is not just internal naysayers, but also suppliers that might fight the change. In addition, the investment for suppliers can be steep in terms of training, equipment, and software.참고 자료
없음"산업경영시스템학회지"의 다른 논문
- 데이터 클러스터링을 위한 혼합 시뮬레이티드 어닐링7페이지
- 스마트폰 구매결정 요인이 재구매 의도에 미치는 영향12페이지
- 중소기업의 외부 기술협력 네트워크의 다양성과 생산성 향상 : 최고기술경영자가 주도하는 기술 개발의 ..5페이지
- 공구유연성과 공구관련제약을 고려한 통합공정일정계획을 위한 유전알고리즘10페이지
- 경로분석을 이용한 사업의 효과성 분석 : 플랜트엔지니어링사업을 중심으로7페이지
- 손실 비용을 고려한 공정 파라미터 허용차 산출 : 망대 특성치의 경우8페이지
- 사회적 기업의 자료포락분석(DEA)을 통한 경영효율성 평가8페이지
- 비즈니스 규칙 기반의 3자 물류 운영 지원8페이지
- 항공사 비정상 운항 복구를 위한 리-타이밍 전략과 개미군집최적화 알고리즘 적용9페이지
- 전사적 PL 대응시스템의 핵심요인이 기업 성과에 미치는 영향9페이지