Addressing the Global Backlash against Investment Arbitration? A Multilateral Investment Agreement and China
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 이준국제법연구원
ㆍ수록지정보 : China and WTO Review / 5권 / 2호
ㆍ저자명 : Junqing Chao
ㆍ저자명 : Junqing Chao
목차
I. IntroductionII. Perceived Drawbacks of the ICS IDAnnulment System
A. Conflict of Values: Substantive Fairness v. Procedural Efficiency
B. Current Situation of an Annulment System: Different ConclusionsMay Be Reached in Similar Cases
C. Disputes on the Application of ICSID Article 52.1(b)
III. Interpretation of “the Arbitral TribunalManifestly Exceeded its Power
A. The Ad hoc Committee’s interpretation of ‘manifestly’
B. “Manifest Excess of Power” Reflected in “Defects in Jurisdiction”
C. “Manifest Excess of Power” Reflected in “Application of Laws”
IV. Models of External Reforms of ICS IDArbitration Mechanism
A. External Appeal System
B. The Problems Revolving around the Establishment ofan Appellate System outside ICSID
V. Improvement within the ICS IDArbitration System
A. Building an Appeal Mechanism within ICSID
B. ‘Reparation’ of the present ICSID Remedy System
VI. Conclusion
References
영어 초록
Over the past decade, the backlash against investment arbitration has become worldwide and correspondingly the investment treaty reform has been undertaken at multiple levels. In this context, a multilateral investment agreement (“MIA”) has been called for as a global effort to address the global backlash. Arguably, the current condition for a MIA might be more favorable than before, as the interests of developed countries and developing countries have changed. After examining the need of a MIA for the global backlash, this paper attempts to explore China’s recent practice in this aspect, including that (1) China’s changing interest in outward foreign direct investment and investment treaty practice reflect the changing landscape of international investment law; (2) the 2016 G20 under China’s presidency achieved the Guiding Principles for Global Investment Policymaking; and (3) China has joined to work on a multilateral framework on investment facilitation at the WTO.참고 자료
없음태그
"China and WTO Review"의 다른 논문
- The Discourse with Chinese Characteristics: An CHEN on ..8페이지
- World Trade Organization Law Research Society of China ..8페이지
- Trump, Trade and National Security: Will Federal Courts..12페이지
- The Influence of Sino-US Summit on Trade Negotiation: A..6페이지
- Nepalese FDI Law and Policy with regard to the Belt and..24페이지