Contracting for Sex? “True Story” of the so-called “Comfort Women” during World War II
(주)코리아스칼라
- 최초 등록일
- 2023.04.03
- 최종 저작일
- 2021.05
- 18페이지/ 어도비 PDF
- 가격 5,200원
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 이준국제법연구원
ㆍ수록지정보 : Journal of East Asia and International Law / 14권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : Yuji Hosaka
목차
1. Introduction
2. Review
A. The Japanese military did hire recruiters to abduct women.
B. Both the Japanese government and military designated the recruiters.
C. Ramseyer’s false claim of “credible commitments” from all women
D. Ramseyer’s mix-up of prostitute (sex-worker) contract and barmaidcontract.
E. Had comfort women high incomes?
F. Comfort women as sex slaves
G. Controversies of Ramseyer’s Paper: Critical Comments
3. Conclusion
영어 초록
Criticism has erupted around the world over the paper “Contracting for sex in the Pacific War” written by Mark Ramseyer, a Mitsubishi professor at Harvard University Law School. Ramseyer insists tha “comfort women” by Japanese imperial military made “credible contracts” with recruiters regardless of the Japanese government or the Japanese military. Ramseyer further insists that the “comfort women” were certified prostitutes. However, the Japanese government selected recruiters secretly and provided them with convenience in mobilizing women. Recruiters have deceived women, mainly by job fraud, into kidnapping them to military brothels. The recruiters signed with Japanese women as barmaids (shakuhu), meaning women who served drinks. However, the Japanese military brothels were prohibited from drinking. Almost Korean women were illiterate in 1940’s, so recruiters did not make contract papers with them. It was very easy to deceive Korean women to make sexual slaves of Japanese military. The surviving Japanese military’s surgeon or soldiers testified that Korean “comfort women” had been sexual slaves.
참고 자료
없음
"Journal of East Asia and International Law"의 다른 논문
더보기 (4/9)