정보시스템 개발 프로젝트의 성공요인에 관한 연구

최초 등록일
2019.03.14
최종 저작일
2019.02
32페이지/워드파일 MS 워드
가격 3,000원 할인쿠폰받기
판매자sec**** (본인인증회원)
다운로드
장바구니

목차

1. Abstract
2. INTRODUCTION
3. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
4. RESEARCH MODEL AND HYPOTHESES DEVELOPMENT
5. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
6. RESULTS
7. DISCUSSION

본문내용

INTRODUCTION

Emerging technology, mostly an outcome of R&D projects and research that focus on critical success factors, is becoming increasingly significant [27, 52]. Corporations and organizations have recently constituted multi-project teams and launched projects to create intricate technologies and products [51]. Moreover, many companies concentrate their core competencies on developing innovative technologies and products through huge investments of various resources such as finance, information technology, human resources, and leadership [66]. Therefore, the interest in project leadership is of growing significance and relevance as projects are being conducted in more complex and unpredictable environments [60].
According to existing literature concerning project management, the role of project leadership is highly significant to a project’s success [74, 98]. Project leadership is also closely associated with project team quality and project performance.

참고 자료

Afsar B, F. Badir Y, Bin Saeed B. Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2014:114(8): 1270-1300.
Aga DA, Noorderhaven N, Vallejo B. Transformational leadership and project success: The mediating role of team-building. Int J Proj Manag. 2016:34(5): 806-818.
Ahmed R. Impact of project manager's intellectual competencies on project success. In. Impact of project manager's intellectual competencies on project success; 2017. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3044362.
Akgün AE, Lynn GS, Keskin H, Dogan D. Team learning in it implementation projects: Antecedents and consequences. Int J Inform Manage. 2014:34(1): 37-47.
Alos-Simo L, Verdu-Jover AJ, Gomez-Gras J-M. How transformational leadership facilitates e-business adoption. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2017:117(2): 382-397.
Anderson MH, Sun PY. Reviewing leadership styles: Overlaps and the need for a new ‘full‐range’theory. Int J Manag Rev. 2017:19(1): 76-96.
Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Publ Adm Res Theor. 2008:18(4): 543-571.
Aronson ZH, Reilly RR, Lynn GS. The impact of leader personality on new product development teamwork and performance: The moderating role of uncertainty. J Eng Technol Manage. 2006:23(3): 221-247.
Aubé C, Rousseau V. Team goal commitment and team effectiveness: The role of task interdependence and supportive behaviors. Group Dyn-Theor Res. 2005:9(3): 189-204.
Baccarini D. The logical framework method for defining project success. Proj Manag J. 1999:30(4): 25-32.
Baker BN, Murphy DC, Fisher D. Factors affecting project success. In: Cleland DI and King WR editors. Factors affecting project success. Project management handbook; Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1988.
Bass B. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press
Bass BM. Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? Am Psychol. 1997:52(2): 130-139.
Bass BM, Avolio BJ. Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Consulting Psychologists Press.
Basten D, Joosten D, Mellis W. Managers' perceptions of information system project success. J Comput Inform Syst. 2011:52(2): 12-21.
Belout A, Gauvreau C. Factors influencing project success: The impact of human resource management. Int J Proj Manag. 2004:22(1): 1-11.
Besner C, Hobbs B. The perceived value and potential contribution of project management practices to project success. Proj Manag J. 2006:37(3): 37-48.
Boyne GA. Public and private management: What’s the difference? J MANAGE STUD. 2002:39(1): 97-122.
Cheng J-W, Chang S-C, Kuo J-H, Cheung Y-H. Ethical leadership, work engagement, and voice behavior. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2014:114(5): 817-831.
Chin WW. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research.
Dóci E, Hofmans J. Task complexity and transformational leadership: The mediating role of leaders' state core self-evaluations. Leadership Quart. 2015:26(3): 436-447.
DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform Syst Res. 1992:3(1): 60-95.
Denison DR, Hart SL, Kahn JA. From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Acad Manage J. 1996:39(4): 1005-1023.
Dingsøyr T, Lindsjørn Y. Team performance in agile development teams: Findings from 18 focus groups. In. Team performance in agile development teams: Findings from 18 focus groups. International Conference on Agile Software Development: Springer; 2013.
Dionne SD, Yammarino FJ, Atwater LE, Spangler WD. Transformational leadership and team performance. J Organ Change Manag. 2004:17(2): 177-193.
Dvir D, Lechler T. Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: The impact of changes on project success. Res Policy. 2004:33(1): 1-15.
Enkel E, Gassmann O, Chesbrough H. Open r&d and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Manage. 2009:39(4): 311-316.
Esposito Vinzi V, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H. Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications. Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer.
Faraj S, Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Manage Sci. 2000:46(12): 1554-1568.
Fernald LW, Solomon GT, Tarabishy A. A new paradigm: Entrepreneurial leadership. South Bus Rev. 2005:30(2): 1-10.
Fernandez S, Cho YJ, Perry JL. Exploring the link between integrated leadership and public sector performance. Leadership Quart. 2010:21(2): 308-323.
Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J Marketing Res. 1981:18(3): 382-388.
Friedrich TL, Vessey WB, Schuelke MJ, Ruark GA, Mumford MD. A framework for understanding collective leadership: The selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks. Leadership Quart. 2009:20(6): 933-958.
Fry LW. Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadership Quart. 2003:14(6): 693-727.
Glisson C, James LR. The cross‐level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. J Organ Behav. 2002:23(6): 767-794.
Goleman D. Leadership that gets results (harvard business review classics). Harvard Business Press.
Gottschalk P, Terje Karlsen J. A comparison of leadership roles in internal it projects versus outsourcing projects. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2005:105(9): 1137-1149.
Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (lmx) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quart. 1995:6(2): 219-247.
Hackman J. The design of work teams. Inj. W. Lorsch (ed.), handbook of organizational behavior. englewood cliffs, nj: prentice-hall.
Hanisch B, Wald A. A project management research framework integrating multiple theoretical perspectives and influencing factors. Proj Manag J. 2011:42(3): 4-22.
Hansen A, Byrne Z, Kiersch C. How interpersonal leadership relates to employee engagement. J Manage Psychol. 2014:29(8): 953-972.
Hartog DN, Muijen JJ, Koopman PL. Transactional versus transformational leadership: An analysis of the mlq. J Occup Organ Psych. 1997:70(1): 19-34.
Hayfield F. Basic factors for a successful project. In. Basic factors for a successful project. 6th Internet Congress; Garmisch-Partenkirchen FRG; 1979.
Hidle K, Normann RH. Who can govern? Comparing network governance leadership in two norwegian city regions. Eur Plan Stud. 2013:21(2): 115-130.
Hirst G, Mann L. A model of r&d leadership and team communication: The relationship with project performance. R&D Manage. 2004:34(2): 147-160.
Hoch JE. Shared leadership and innovation: The role of vertical leadership and employee integrity. J Bus Psychol. 2013:28(2): 159-174.
Hoch JE, Bommer WH, Dulebohn JH, Wu D. Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. J Manage. 2018:44(2): 501-529.
Hocking R, Pendleton O. The regression dilemma. Commun Stat Theory. 1983:12(5): 497-527.
Hoegl M, Ernst H, Proserpio L. How teamwork matters more as team member dispersion increases. J Prod Innovat Manag. 2007:24(2): 156-165.
Hoegl M, Gemuenden HG. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ Sci. 2001:12(4): 435-449.
Hoegl M, Weinkauf K, Gemuenden HG. Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam r&d projects: A longitudinal study. Organ Sci. 2004:15(1): 38-55.
Hollmann V, Lee H, Zo H, Ciganek AP. Examining success factors of open source software repositories: The case of osor. Eu portal. Int J Bus Inform Syst. 2013:14(1): 1-20.
Hooijberg R, Choi J. The impact of organizational characteristics on leadership effectiveness models: An examination of leadership in a private and a public sector organization. Admin Soc. 2001:33(4): 403-431.
Hsu JS-C, Shih S-P, Chiang JC, Liu JY-C. The impact of transactive memory systems on is development teams' coordination, communication, and performance. Int J Proj Manag. 2012:30(3): 329-340.
Jeppesen LB, Frederiksen L. Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ Sci. 2006:17(1): 45-63.
Keller RT. Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. J Appl Psychol. 2006:91(1): 202.
Koohang A, Hatch M. Leadership effectiveness in it-centered organizations: Gender and levels of management. J Comput Inform Syst. 2017:57(4): 385-391.
Koohang A, Paliszkiewicz J, Goluchowski J. The impact of leadership on trust, knowledge management, and organizational performance: A research model. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2017:117(3): 521-537.
Korzaan M, Erskine M. The influence of goal orientation, goal commitment, and implementation mindset on project success. In. The influence of goal orientation, goal commitment, and implementation mindset on project success. Americas Conference On Information Systems; New Orleans; 2018.
Krahn J, Hartment F. Effective project leadership: A combination of project manager skills and competencies in context. In. Effective project leadership: A combination of project manager skills and competencies in context. Biennial meeting of the Project Management Institute Research Conference, Montreal, Canada; 2006.
Kuthyola KF, Liu JY-C, Klein G. Influence of task interdependence on teamwork quality and project performance. In. Influence of task interdependence on teamwork quality and project performance. International Conference on Business Information Systems: Springer; 2017.
Lee FL, Chan JM. Digital media use and participation leadership in social protests: The case of tiananmen commemoration in hong kong. Telemat Inform. 2015:32(4): 879-889.
Müller R, Turner JR. Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type. Int J Proj Manag. 2007:25(1): 21-32.
Müller R, Turner R. The influence of project managers on project success criteria and project success by type of project. Eur Manag J. 2007:25(4): 298-309.
Maqbool R, Sudong Y, Manzoor N, Rashid Y. The impact of emotional intelligence, project managers’ competencies, and transformational leadership on project success: An empirical perspective. Proj Manag J. 2017:48(3): 58-75.
Markus ML, Christiaanse E. Adoption and impact of collaboration electronic marketplaces. Inf Syst E-Bus Manag. 2003:1(2): 139-155.
Mathieu J, Maynard MT, Rapp T, Gilson L. Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J Manage. 2008:34(3): 410-476.
Mayer DM, Aquino K, Greenbaum RL, Kuenzi M. Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Acad Manage J. 2012:55(1): 151-171.
McGuire M, Agranoff R. The limitations of public management networks. Public Admin. 2011:89(2): 265-284.
Mehra A, Smith BR, Dixon AL, Robertson B. Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quart. 2006:17(3): 232-245.
Mohrman SA, Cohen SG, Morhman Jr AM. Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. Jossey-Bass.
Mumford MD, Friedrich TL, Vessey WB, Ruark GA. Collective leadership: Thinking about issues vis-à-vis others. Ind Organ Psychol-Us. 2012:5(4): 408-411.
Mumford MD, Strange JM. Vision and mental models: The case of charismatic and ideological leadership. In. Vision and mental models: The case of charismatic and ideological leadership. Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead 10th anniversary edition: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2013.
Oz E, Sosik JJ. Why information systems projects are abandoned: A leadership and communication theory and exploratory study. J Comput Inform Syst. 2000:41(1): 66-78.
Papke-Shields KE, Boyer-Wright KM. Strategic planning characteristics applied to project management. Int J Proj Manag. 2017:35(2): 169-179.
Piening EP. Dynamic capabilities in public organizations: A literature review and research agenda. Public Manag Rev. 2013:15(2): 209-245.
Pinto JK, Prescott JE. Variations in critical success factors over the stages in the project life cycle. J Manage. 1988:14(1): 5-18.
Pinto MB, Pinto JK. Project team communication and cross‐functional cooperation in new program development. J Prod Innovat Manag. 1990:7(3): 200-212.
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003:88(5): 879-903.
Qin L, Hsu J, Stern M. Evaluating the usage of cloud-based collaboration services through teamwork. J Educ Bus. 2016:91(4): 227-235.
Renko M, El Tarabishy A, Carsrud AL, Brännback M. Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. J Small Bus Manage. 2015:53(1): 54-74.
Ricard LM, Klijn EH, Lewis JM, Ysa T. Assessing public leadership styles for innovation: A comparison of copenhagen, rotterdam and barcelona. Public Manag Rev. 2017:19(2): 134-156.
Richardson HA, Vandenberg RJ. Integrating managerial perceptions and transformational leadership into a work‐unit level model of employee involvement. J Organ Behav. 2005:26(5): 561-589.
Saafein O, Shaykhian GA. Factors affecting virtual team performance in telecommunication support environment. Telemat Inform. 2014:31(3): 459-462.
Salas E, Cooke NJ, Rosen MA. On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Hum Factors. 2008:50(3): 540-547.
Sarstedt M, Henseler J, Ringle CM. Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (pls) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. In. Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (pls) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. Measurement and research methods in international marketing: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2011.
Standing C, Guilfoyle A, Lin C, Love PE. The attribution of success and failure in it projects. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2006:106(8): 1148-1165.
Sundstrom E, De Meuse KP, Futrell D. Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. Am Psychol. 1990:45(2): 120-133.
Swiercz PM, Lydon SR. Entrepreneurial leadership in high-tech firms: A field study. Leadership Org Dev J. 2002:23(7): 380-389.
Thite M. Leadership styles in information technology projects. Int J Proj Manag. 2000:18(4): 235-241.
Tummers LG, Knies E. Leadership and meaningful work in the public sector. Public Admin Rev. 2013:73(6): 859-868.
Van Dierendonck D. Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. J Manage. 2011:37(4): 1228-1261.
Van Wart M. Leadership in public organizations: An introduction. Routledge.
Van Wart M, Roman A, Wang X, Liu C. Integrating ict adoption issues into (e-) leadership theory. Telemat Inform. 2017:34(5): 527-537.
Walumbwa FO, Avolio BJ, Gardner WL, Wernsing TS, Peterson SJ. Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. J Manage. 2008:34(1): 89-126.
Wart MV. Public‐sector leadership theory: An assessment. Public Admin Rev. 2003:63(2): 214-228.
Yammarino FJ, Salas E, Serban A, Shirreffs K, Shuffler ML. Collectivistic leadership approaches: Putting the “we” in leadership science and practice. Ind Organ Psychol-Us. 2012:5(4): 382-402.
Yang L-R, Huang C-F, Wu K-S. The association among project manager's leadership style, teamwork and project success. Int J Proj Manag. 2011:29(3): 258-267.

자료문의

ㆍ이 자료에 대해 궁금한 점을 판매자에게 직접 문의 하실 수 있습니다.
ㆍ상업성 광고글, 욕설, 비방글, 내용 없는 글 등은 운영 방침에 따라 예고 없이 삭제될 수 있습니다.
ㆍ다운로드가 되지 않는 등 서비스 불편사항은 고객센터 1:1 문의하기를 이용해주세요.

판매자 정보

sec****
(본인인증회원)
회원 소개글이 없습니다.
판매지수
ㆍ판매 자료수
17
ㆍ전체 판매량
340
ㆍ최근 3개월 판매량
18
ㆍ자료후기 점수
평균 A
ㆍ자료문의 응답률
받은문의없음
판매자 정보
ㆍ학교정보
  • 비공개
ㆍ직장정보
  • 비공개
ㆍ자격증
  • 비공개
  • 위 정보 및 게시물 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 아니하며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
    위 정보 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재·배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
    저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁요소 발견시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.

    찾던 자료가 아닌가요?아래 자료들 중 찾던 자료가 있는지 확인해보세요

    • 한글파일 프로젝트관리론 6장 REPORT 5페이지
      하는가? 9)프로젝트관리에서 왜 리더십이 중요한가? 10)세 가지 주요한 ... 리더십이 중요한가? 프로젝트관리에서 리더십이 중요한 이유는 이것이 조직의 ... . 따라서 프로젝트관리자는 효과적인 리더십을 발휘해야 한다. 그러기
    • 한글파일 대학 내 팀 프로젝트의 성공에 미치는 긍정적 요인에 관한 연구 (A플러스 자료) 20페이지
      성분행렬은 리더십을 제외한 나머지 요인들이 다른 요인들과 혼재되어 있는 ... Relationship) 및 리더십측면을 들면서 이들이 최적 상태에 있어야 한다고 ... 해결될 수 있어야 하며, 개방적이고 민주적인 풍토를 조성하는 리더십
    • 한글파일 디지털 기업을 위한 경영정보시스템(제3판) 3장 사례연구 과제 4페이지
      및 전사통합시스템을 구축하여 궁극적으로 철강업계의 글로벌 리더십 ... 지향적인 리더십이다. PI를 최초로 추진했던 유상부 전 포스코 회장은 ... 등의 파격적인 리더십을 보여주었다. 유 회장의 뒤를 이은 이구택 포스코
    • 파워포인트파일 진정성이란 무엇인가, 진성 리더십에 대하여 12페이지
      . 진성리더십을 통한 위기 관리 (1) 위기는 회사들이 가지고 있는 정신 ... 리더십의 실천 ( 리처드 세인트 존 해리스 : 성공하는 사람들의 여덟가지 ... 진정성이란 무엇인가 - 진성 리더십에 대하여 1. 진정성에 대한시대적
    • 파워포인트파일 간호관리-바람직한 조직문화 11페이지
      리더십 구성요인 내용 변혁적 리더십 이상적 영향력 ( 카리스마 ... 요인 내용 셀프 리더십 자기 설정 목표 조직의 목표를 자신의 것으로 ... . 구성요소 공유가치 전략 구조 시스 템 구성원 기술 리더십 스타일
    • 한글파일 인력개발과활용 과제 ( 조직변화 ) 4페이지
      , 수평적 협력을 필요로 한다. 그리고 정보를 공유하며, 카리스마 리더십 ... 보다는 스토리텔러형 리더십 필요하다. 네 번째, 권한의 집중에서 권한의 ... 경영목표 달성에 직결되는 기술교육, 기능교육, 직무교육보다는 리더십
    • 한글파일 간호조직의 문제 및 조직적 측면의 접근 3페이지
      간호단위관리자의 리더십도 매우 중요하다. 리더십의 정의중 대표적인 것들을 ... 갖고 있다. 비슷한 리더십유형으로 관리격자이론의 팀형을 들 수 있다. 팀 ... , 리더가 조직구성원에게 감동을 주는 변혁적 리더십의 핵심요인이다. 변혁적
    더보기
    상세하단 배너
    우수 콘텐츠 서비스 품질인증 획득
    최근 본 자료더보기
    정보시스템 개발 프로젝트의 성공요인에 관한 연구 무료자료보기