[Final Essay / NTNU] Implicit and Explicit CSR(Corporation Social Responsibility)

최초 등록일
2018.07.23
최종 저작일
2017.11
11페이지/파일확장자 어도비 PDF
가격 500원 할인쿠폰받기
판매자sung**** 2회 판매
다운로드
장바구니

목차

1. CSR Redefinition and Social Legitimacy
2. Distinction between implicit and explicit CSR
3. Institutional frameworks based on NBSs
4. Weakened Framework: European Explicit CSR
5. Why Explicit CSR Spreading to European Countries?
6. What drives explicit CSR is settled?
7. European Explicit CSR case: NORSOK standard and Norwegian Petroleum Industry
8. Korean Chaebol and their explicit CSR: Samsung’s Case
9. Conclusion
10. References

본문내용

This essay contains how we explain the general transition from implicit to explicit corporation social responsibility (CSR) throughout the United States and European countries and typical distinctions of both implicit and explicit CSRs. From a specific case study, this essay examined how European explicit CSR is settled strategically in Norwegian oil and gas industry by referencing to NORSOK standard. In addition, the explication of the transition to the other parts of the world will be also discussed in the essay taking for one of “Chaebol” corporation’s case in South Korea as an example.

CSR Redefinition and Social Legitimacy
While it seems that more frequent fundamental discussions had been preceded regarding CSR before the millennium, for instance, how on earth a firm could have responsibility or how CSR is moral indeed (cf. Friedman, 1970, Carroll, 1991), CSR had been redefined due to globalization induced by internationalization, technological advancement and political liberalization (Woods, 2001, p.290)

참고 자료

Matten D., Moon J., 2008, “ Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility, Academy of Management Review Vol.33, No.2, pp 404-424
Carson S. G., Hagen Ø., Sethi S. P., 2013, From Implicit to Explicit CSR in a Scandinavian Context: The Cases of HÅG and Hydro, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
Woods N., 2001, International Political Economy in an Age of Globalization, The Globalization of World Politics, Oxford University Press, 2001, pp.277-298
March J. G., Olsen J. P., 1989, Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics Statoil, 2016, Annual Report and Form 20-F
Freeman R. E., McVea J., 2001, A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management, Pitman Publishing, Darden Graduation School of Business Administration, University of Virginia
Friedman M., 1970, The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits, New York Times Magazine, 33.
Carroll A. B., 1991, Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders
Petroleum Safety Authority (PSA) Norway, 2016, Regulations relating to Health, Safety and the Environment in the Petroleum Activities and at Certain Onshore Facilities, “The Framework Regulations”, Last amended 17 June 2016, Also retrieved at (http://www.psa.no/getfile.php/1339332/Regelverket/Rammeforskriften_e.pdf) (Accessed on 22-11-2017)
Standard Norge, 2016, NORSOK A-001N, Retningslinjer for utvikling og utforming av NORSOK standarder (in Norwegian)
Murillo. D., Sung. Y., 2013, Understanding Korean Capitalism: Chaebols and their Corporate Governance

자료문의

ㆍ이 자료에 대해 궁금한 점을 판매자에게 직접 문의 하실 수 있습니다.
ㆍ상업성 광고글, 욕설, 비방글, 내용 없는 글 등은 운영 방침에 따라 예고 없이 삭제될 수 있습니다.
ㆍ다운로드가 되지 않는 등 서비스 불편사항은 고객센터 1:1 문의하기를 이용해주세요.

판매자 정보

sung****
회원 소개글이 없습니다.
판매지수
ㆍ판매 자료수
9
ㆍ전체 판매량
16
ㆍ최근 3개월 판매량
1
ㆍ자료후기 점수
평균
ㆍ자료문의 응답률
받은문의없음
판매자 정보
ㆍ학교정보
  • 비공개
ㆍ직장정보
  • 비공개
ㆍ자격증
  • 비공개
  • 위 정보 및 게시물 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 아니하며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
    위 정보 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재·배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
    저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁요소 발견시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.

    찾던 자료가 아닌가요?아래 자료들 중 찾던 자료가 있는지 확인해보세요

    더보기
    상세하단 배너
    우수 콘텐츠 서비스 품질인증 획득
    최근 본 자료더보기
    [Final Essay / NTNU] Implicit and Explicit CSR(Corporation Social Responsibility)