브로델과 초두리

저작시기 2010.08 |등록일 2010.11.22 파일확장자어도비 PDF (pdf) | 21페이지 | 가격 6,000원
다운로드
장바구니관심자료
상세신규 배너

* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.

서지정보

발행기관 : 한국프랑스사학회 수록지정보 : 프랑스사 연구
저자명 : 고원

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 프랑크의 유럽중심주의 비판
Ⅲ. 브로델과 자본주의들의 역사
Ⅳ. 유럽 이전의 아시아
Ⅴ. 결론 : 또 하나의 유럽중심주의?
〈Resume〉
〈Summary〉

한국어 초록

The purpose of this article is to examine A. G. Frank"s criticism of eurocentrism in his Reorient. This economic historian says that Asia has been the center of the World Economy since the bronze age until around the end of 18th century, whereas Europe has been a poor and isolated province during this long period. But, according to him, eurocentrist scholars like Karl Marx, Max Weber, Talcott Parsons, Walt Whitman Rostow has ignore the historic fact, the asian hegemony during the pre-modern age.
This article criticized the opinion of A. G. Frank with the help of Fernand Braudel and K. N. Chaudhuri. Fernand Braudel is considered to be eurocentric, but from our viewpoint, is not, while K. N. Chaudhuri was praised as a nori-eurocentrist scholar in Reorient. We examined A. G. Frank"s criticism of Fernand Braudel and K. N. Chaudhuri, and his historical perspective making this confrontation, supporting his criticism of eurocentrism.
A. G. Frank himself did not surpass the eurocentrism in spite of his criticism in Reorient. We considered him as a anti-eurocentric eurocentrist according to the expression of Immanuel Wallerstein. A. G. Frank criticizes the eurocentrism of eminent scholars and explains global economy in the asian age, but his historical perspective is merely the asiancentrism, a reversed image of the eurocentrism. We should deconstruct, to surpass the eurocentrism, the structure of opposition and the concepts of Europe and Asia, because they are the imaginaries made by the eurocentrism.

영어 초록

The purpose of this article is to examine A. G. Frank's criticism of eurocentrism in his Reorient. This economic historian says that Asia has been the center of the World Economy since the bronze age until around the end of 18th century, whereas Europe has been a poor and isolated province during this long period. But, according to him, eurocentrist scholars like Karl Marx, Max Weber, Talcott Parsons, Walt Whitman Rostow has ignore the historic fact, the asian hegemony during the pre-modern age.
This article criticized the opinion of A. G. Frank with the help of Fernand Braudel and K. N. Chaudhuri. Fernand Braudel is considered to be eurocentric, but from our viewpoint, is not, while K. N. Chaudhuri was praised as a nori-eurocentrist scholar in Reorient. We examined A. G. Frank's criticism of Fernand Braudel and K. N. Chaudhuri, and his historical perspective making this confrontation, supporting his criticism of eurocentrism.
A. G. Frank himself did not surpass the eurocentrism in spite of his criticism in Reorient. We considered him as a anti-eurocentric eurocentrist according to the expression of Immanuel Wallerstein. A. G. Frank criticizes the eurocentrism of eminent scholars and explains global economy in the asian age, but his historical perspective is merely the asiancentrism, a reversed image of the eurocentrism. We should deconstruct, to surpass the eurocentrism, the structure of opposition and the concepts of Europe and Asia, because they are the imaginaries made by the eurocentrism.

참고 자료

없음
  • 구매평가(0)
  • 구매문의(0)
      최근 구매한 회원 학교정보 보기
      1. 최근 2주간 다운받은 회원수와 학교정보이며
         구매한 본인의 구매정보도 함께 표시됩니다.
      2. 매시 정각마다 업데이트 됩니다. (02:00 ~ 21:00)
      3. 구매자의 학교정보가 없는 경우 기타로 표시됩니다.
      4. 지식포인트 보유 시 지식포인트가 차감되며
         미보유 시 아이디당 1일 3회만 제공됩니다.
      상세하단 배너
      우수 콘텐츠 서비스 품질인증 획득
      최근 본 자료더보기
      상세우측 배너
      상세우측 배너
      브로델과 초두리
      페이지
      만족도 조사

      페이지 사용에 불편하신 점이 있으십니까?

      의견 보내기