正当化の観点から見るストラテジーの日韓比較 ― #MeTooに関するYouTubeのコメントを中心に ―

최초 등록일
2020.05.19
최종 저작일
2020.05
20페이지/파일확장자 어도비 PDF
가격 5,500원 할인쿠폰받기
판매자한국학술정보(주)
다운로드
장바구니

* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.

서지정보

발행기관 : 한국일본어교육학회 수록지정보 : 일본어교육 / 91권
저자명 : 하시타니모에카 ( Hashitani Moeka )

영어 초록

This article clarifies what kind of legitimation strategies are used by Japanese and Korean people in YouTube comments regarding the #MeToo movement and gender awareness in Japan and Korea. Legitimation is based on several constructs: authorization, emotion, evaluation, speculation and estimation, quotation, definition, classification, comparison, and cooperation. This study reveals that evaluation, quotation, and classification strategies were used the most in both countries. However, several discrepancies were found in the results. First, in the case of evaluation, Japanese people tended to use only negative expressions, whereas Korean people tended to use both positive and negative ones. Moreover, in the case of quotation, Japanese people mostly referred to events relayed by the media, whereas Korean people also shared their own experiences. Interestingly, in the case of classification, Japanese people drew a clear distinction between a younger and an older generation, assessing the latter one negatively. Also, Japanese people’s lack of awareness about social issues was emphasized when compared to North American people. In opposition, Korean people distinguished victims from assailants, and victims expressed empathy by telling their own stories and regarding them as inner and outer. Lastly, Korean people were more prone to express their emotions compared to Japanese people. In conclusion, many negative aspects of the #MeToo movement were mentioned by Japanese people, however, there were not only negative one but also positive one which Korean people told their own experiences and show empathy despite the rate of using strategies was almost close. The reason of the result can be the huge influence of Japanese and Korean history, culture, and media.

참고 자료

없음

자료문의

제휴사는 별도로 자료문의를 받지 않고 있습니다.

판매자 정보

한국학술정보(주)는 콘텐츠 제작에 도움이 되는 솔루션을 기반으로 풍부한 문화 콘텐츠를 생성하여 새로운 삶의 가치를 창조합니다.

본 학술논문은 한국학술정보(주)와 각 학회간에 저작권계약이 체결된 것으로 AgentSoft가 제공 하고 있습니다.
본 저작물을 불법적으로 이용시는 법적인 제재가 가해질 수 있습니다.

우수 콘텐츠 서비스 품질인증 획득
최근 본 자료더보기
正当化の観点から見るストラテジーの日韓比較 ― #MeTooに関するYouTubeのコメントを中心に ―