완료상표지 ‘有’의 품사자질 연구 - ‘유몰유(有沒有)+VP?’구조를 중심으로

한국학술정보(주)
최초 등록일
2019.11.06
최종 저작일
2019.11
21페이지/파일확장자 어도비 PDF
가격 5,600원 할인쿠폰받기
다운로드
장바구니
퀴즈OX 이벤트

* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.

서지정보

발행기관 : 한국외국어대학교 중국연구소 수록지정보 : 중국연구 / 80권
저자명 : 최정미 ( Choi Jung Mi ) , 최재영 ( Choi Jae-young )

영어 초록

The question ‘YOUMEIYOU(有沒有)+VP?’ indicating ‘Perfect’ was mainly used in the Southern Chinese dialect, recently this question ‘YOUMEIYOU(有沒有)+VP?’ has also been widely used in Mandarin. In the academic world, it is reported that the appearance of ‘YOUMEIYOU(有沒有)+VP?’ was influenced by the Southern Chinese dialect. However, there are divergent opinions about the part of speech of ‘YOU (有)’, such as ‘auxiliary verb’ , ‘adverb’ , ‘verb’, and ‘particle’ etc,, and these are classifiable into two main theories-‘auxiliary verb’ theory and ‘adverb’ theory. In this paper, we considered the validity of these two theories in terms of syntactic, semantic, diachronous, and typological. The results are as follows.First, based on the prototype category theory, we reclassified typical syntactic and untypical syntactic features of ‘auxiliary verb’ and ‘adverb’. Through this, we considered the syntactic features of ‘YOU(有)’ are closer to the syntactic features of either of the two. As a result, It is reasonable to think that ‘有(YOU)’ is an ‘adverb’ that has untypical syntactic features (It is ‘adverb’, but can constitute a positive-negative question, such as ‘ZAIBUZAI(再不再)’, ‘CHANGBUCHANG(常不常)’, ‘CENGBUCENG(曾不曾)’ and so on.).Second, the semantic features of ‘YOU(有)’ in the question ‘YOUMEIYOU(有沒 有)+VP?’ indicates ‘Aspect’ meaning (‘Perfect’), does not indicate the ‘Modality’ meaning represented by the general ‘auxiliary verb’(ability, will, deontic, epistemic etc.). Unlike English, contemporary Mandarin does not have a separate form of ‘auxiliary verb’(have, be) that represents ‘Modality’ and ‘Aspect’. On the other hand, it is reasonable to consider ‘You(有)’ as an ‘adverb’, because ‘adverb’ has played a role of ‘Aspect’ meaning(Ceng(曾), Yi(已), Zai(在), Yao(要) etc.) from the pre-QIN(先 秦) dynasty before the appearance of ‘Perfect particle’ ‘了’.Third, in the Chinese history and grammar academic world,the prevailing view is that ‘MEIYOU(沒有)’ which began to appear in front of VP in Ming(明) dynasty is regarded as a ‘negative adverb’. Therefore, if ‘MEIYOU(沒有)’ in the question ‘YOUMEIYOU(有沒有)+VP?’ is regarded as a ‘negative adverb’, it is not reasonable to regard the remaining ‘有(YOU)’ as an auxiliary verb. Also, there are some examples of 'You(有)' written as an ‘adverb’ in the pre-QIN(先秦) dynasty, so it is reasonable to regard ‘有(YOU)’ as an ‘adverb’.Fourth, according to the study of the linguistic typological theory, the ‘H-POSSESSIVE’ verb was grammaticalized toward ‘Perfect’ marker in many languages around the world. However, after this grammaticalization the part of speech is not all ‘auxiliary verb’. In some languages, they can be grammaticalized toward ‘adverb’. Therefore, it is reasonable to regard ‘有(YOU)’ as an ‘adverb’.

참고 자료

없음

자료문의

제휴사는 별도로 자료문의를 받지 않고 있습니다.

판매자 정보

한국학술정보(주)는 콘텐츠 제작에 도움이 되는 솔루션을 기반으로 풍부한 문화 콘텐츠를 생성하여 새로운 삶의 가치를 창조합니다.

주의사항

저작권 본 학술논문은 한국학술정보(주)와 각 학회간에 저작권계약이 체결된 것으로 AgentSoft가 제공 하고 있습니다.
본 저작물을 불법적으로 이용시는 법적인 제재가 가해질 수 있습니다.
환불정책

해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.

파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
우수 콘텐츠 서비스 품질인증 획득
최근 본 자료더보기
완료상표지 ‘有’의 품사자질 연구 - ‘유몰유(有沒有)+VP?’구조를 중심으로