논문 : 플라톤의 『 파르메니데스 』 편에 나타난 변증법 연구 (2) - 제 1가정에서 일자 (一者) 의 변증법적 성격 -

저작시기 1995.01 |등록일 2003.07.10 파일확장자어도비 PDF (pdf) | 24페이지 | 가격 5,900원
다운로드
장바구니관심자료
상세신규 배너

* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.

서지정보

발행기관 : 한국서양고전학회 수록지정보 : 서양고전학연구 / 9권 / 157 ~ 180 페이지
저자명 : 송영진(Young Juin Song)

없음

영어 초록

Plato`s dialogue, Parmenides has been read as everything from a joke to an exercise of dialectic in the detection of fallocies, even to a revelation of the Unknown God. But recently R.E. Allen(1983) used the structure of Parmenides as a control on the interpretation of individual passages, to solve the dialogue as one might crack a code, in order to obtain within such limitation as that subject-matter may admit results which are probably true. M.H. Miller, JR.(1986) also said the dialog-form as Mimetic Irony and strucure to interpret the relation of the two main parts of Parmenides fitted together to constitute a typical dramatic wholes. The aim throughout this essay is to use the double meaning theory(not F.M.Conford`s ambiguity theory) of the main terms of Plato`s dialectic(one-plulality, whole-part, same-different, etc.) which is obtained through the analysis of Zeno`s plulality argument, to reveal the function of The One in the first hypothesis, or to find out the logical characteristics of The One in relation to Parmenides` ontology. The results that are gained by using double-meaning theory are to be that the dialectical function of The One of the first hypothesis is just the same as that of the second hypothesis. But The One of the first hypothesis is different from that of the second hypothesis in it`s contents. The One of the first hypothesis excludes all things that are contained in the one of the second hypothesis. So if we consider the relation between the dialectic of the first main part of this dialog(Parmenides` criticism of Socrates` eidos-theory) and the hypothetitcal exercise of zenonnion dialectic of the second part, `fhe One of the first hypothesis must have some logically compensatory relation to the one of the second hypothesis so that it has double meaning. So, this essay tries to find out the double meaning of The One in the first hypothesis in relation with the historically-said Parmenides` C)ne. In regard to the ontological problems of Plato`s eidos, this essay suggests double-aspect theory, which consists in the dialectical reduction of Plato`s early atomic eidos theory, and shows the difference of the truth value criteria between logical status and ontological status of Plato`s language through hermaneutic analysis of the One in the first hypothesis. In short, in this dialog the hypothetical exercises of zenonian dialect are the critical responses to Parmenides` criticism of Socrates` eidos theory of te first part.

참고 자료

없음
  • 구매평가(0)
  • 구매문의(0)
      최근 구매한 회원 학교정보 보기
      1. 최근 2주간 다운받은 회원수와 학교정보이며
         구매한 본인의 구매정보도 함께 표시됩니다.
      2. 매시 정각마다 업데이트 됩니다. (02:00 ~ 21:00)
      3. 구매자의 학교정보가 없는 경우 기타로 표시됩니다.
      4. 지식포인트 보유 시 지식포인트가 차감되며
         미보유 시 아이디당 1일 3회만 제공됩니다.

      찾던 자료가 아닌가요?아래 자료들 중 찾던 자료가 있는지 확인해보세요

      상세하단 배너
      우수 콘텐츠 서비스 품질인증 획득
      최근 본 자료더보기
      상세우측 배너
      상세우측 배너
      상세우측 배너
      논문 : 플라톤의 『 파르메니데스 』 편에 나타난 변증법 연구 (2) - 제 1가정에서 일자 (一者) 의 변증법적 성격 -
      페이지
      만족도 조사

      페이지 사용에 불편하신 점이 있으십니까?

      의견 보내기