자질유인 이론에서 본 능격 / 절대격 언어

저작시기 1997.01 |등록일 2003.07.10 파일확장자어도비 PDF (pdf) | 59페이지 | 가격 9,900원
다운로드
장바구니관심자료
상세신규 배너

* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.

서지정보

발행기관 : 경남대학교 인문과학연구소 수록지정보 : 인문논총 / 20권 / 263 ~ 321 페이지
저자명 : 윤만근 ( Man Kun Yoon )

없음

영어 초록

It is generally believed that ergative/absolutive languages are quite different from nominative/accusative languages and are excluded in the description of the theory of generative grammar. However, recently some MIT scholars have developed a unified theory which can accommodate the structure of ergative/absolutive languages in the structure of nominative/ accusative languages. Therefore, the first aim of this paper is to formulate a unified theory of grammar between the two languages in the frame work of the minimalist program or in the Attract-F Theory based on ergative/absolutive structures found in the Korean language. The structure shown in (74) above is my proposal for the ergative/absolutive structures in the Korean language in the frame of Attract-F Theory, and I expect some comments about it from other scholars. The second purpose of this paper is to argue that the ergative conception, proposed by Marants(1984) and others who followed the same line, should be banned in the linguistic societies. The most serious reason is that the original conception of "Ergativity" is not like that and furthermore, the use of such wrong is misleading many linguistic students and scholars and makes us confused so far. As Dixon(1994) deplores the use of "ergative parameter" which allowes a fake conception of ergativity, the wrong conception of ergativity should be eliminated or it should be corrected as the original ergative meaning. The third purpose of this paper is to argue that ECM-structures in English treated in an "exceptional" way in that the structure is exceptional in assigning theta roles and cases, but such phenomena are a general format of sentences in ergative/absolutive languages, not exceptional. In ergative languages such structures are called "Syntactic Ergativity". Therefore, let me argue that it is a way towards "univeral grammar" when we capture similarity between ECM and Syntactic Ergativity. In ergative languages, a special rule called "antipassivization" is being used to make two clauses to have the properties of ECM or syntactic ergativity. Finally the foregoing discussions and analyses lead us to conclude that semantic roles between nominative/accusative languages and ergative/ absolutive languages are the same, but assigning surface cases are different: in ergative languages, two different subject cases are assigned when the clause is transitive. Ergative case, which is subject case, is assigned to Agent arguments and another subject case, which is called "Absolutive", is assigned to Patient/Theme arguments. This means that the transitive clauses in ergative languages almost always slow double subject constructions.

참고 자료

없음
  • 구매평가(0)
  • 구매문의(0)
      최근 구매한 회원 학교정보 보기
      1. 최근 2주간 다운받은 회원수와 학교정보이며
         구매한 본인의 구매정보도 함께 표시됩니다.
      2. 매시 정각마다 업데이트 됩니다. (02:00 ~ 21:00)
      3. 구매자의 학교정보가 없는 경우 기타로 표시됩니다.
      4. 지식포인트 보유 시 지식포인트가 차감되며
         미보유 시 아이디당 1일 3회만 제공됩니다.
      상세하단 배너
      우수 콘텐츠 서비스 품질인증 획득
      최근 본 자료더보기
      상세우측 배너
      상세우측 배너
      상세우측 배너
      자질유인 이론에서 본 능격 / 절대격 언어
      페이지
      만족도 조사

      페이지 사용에 불편하신 점이 있으십니까?

      의견 보내기