역사 대중화와 역사학

저작시기 2016.06 |등록일 2016.07.12 파일확장자어도비 PDF (pdf) | 38페이지 | 가격 6,000원
다운로드
장바구니관심자료
상세신규 배너

* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.

서지정보

발행기관 : 한국역사연구회 수록지정보 : 역사와현실
저자명 : 오항녕

목차

머리말
1. 역사-소비의 다양한 양상
2. 역사의 토대를 흔드는 대중화
3. 역사학과 역사-소비의 거리
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

영어 초록

I, in this article, marking the year 1990 as a milestone, aimed to give an overview on the efforts by the Korean history community to “popularize” the outcome of their research. I also shed a light on the current situation of the “history consumption” by the public through mass media such as movies and TV dramas.
As early as the 1980s, while striving to disengage itself from the historicism predominantly focused on politics and famed political figures, the Korean history community already began its research in an attempt to bring into the various foregrounds of history those common people like peasants and laborers as an underlying mainstream, and as the research found diversity in the economic, social and cultural aspects of history, the efforts were never discontinued to share the achievements with the public.
However, in the “history consumption” process were found some problems, one of which was the confusion of fact and fiction, a phenomenon dubbed “faction” by a newly coined term. Moreover, due to the lack of substantial evidence and documents, there were even some cases in which it resulted in “fabrication” way beyond the boundaries of acceptable suppositions and conjectures and this was synonymous with the negation of the very identity of the historical studies as an empirical discipline.
The line between history and morality was blurred too, which was followed by the evaluation method based on the good- versus- evil (I call it “Konggyi-Patgyi”, two characters in Korean folk tale) frequently degenerating the discipline of historical studies into a battlefield among warring camps. This was reflected in the attitudes of the government and the ruling party when they unsuccessfully tried to nationalize the Korean history textbook .
The Korean history community can never be exempt from its share of responsibility and criticism for this distortion in the history consumption process. Unfortunately It still finds itself trapped in the curriculum organization disproportionately centered on the national history and ,nevertheless, remains encaged in the interpretational framework of the Western historicism that postulates the Western modernity as an ideal model for the historical developments. One of the common fallacies committed by many historians is that they view the discipline of historical studies as one of mere interpretation.
The factional viewpoints that are currently pervasive and recurrently reproduced in the studies on the history of the Joseon dynasty are clear evidence that the Korean history community still lacks the logical approach required to distinguish between history and morality.

참고 자료

없음
  • 구매평가(0)
  • 구매문의(0)
      최근 구매한 회원 학교정보 보기
      1. 최근 2주간 다운받은 회원수와 학교정보이며
         구매한 본인의 구매정보도 함께 표시됩니다.
      2. 매시 정각마다 업데이트 됩니다. (02:00 ~ 21:00)
      3. 구매자의 학교정보가 없는 경우 기타로 표시됩니다.
      4. 지식포인트 보유 시 지식포인트가 차감되며
         미보유 시 아이디당 1일 3회만 제공됩니다.

      찾던 자료가 아닌가요?아래 자료들 중 찾던 자료가 있는지 확인해보세요

      상세하단 배너
      우수 콘텐츠 서비스 품질인증 획득
      최근 본 자료더보기
      상세우측 배너
      역사 대중화와 역사학
      페이지
      만족도 조사

      페이지 사용에 불편하신 점이 있으십니까?

      의견 보내기