* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국미술연구소
ㆍ수록지정보 : 美術史論壇 / 34권
ㆍ저자명 : 홍선표
ㆍ저자명 : 홍선표
영어 초록
Despite few official records about the court painter Kim Hongdo(金弘道, 1745-1806), there has been much biographical research on the artist. Yet, there remain some parts of his lineage that require revision. This study presents the first comprehensive research on Kim Hongdo that reconstruct Kim’s life based on newly discovered historical texts, thereby bringing the artist to light as a literati-style court painter, a newly created type of artist during the Joseon period.Kim Hongdo was born to a family of the military official class that used to be wealthy. He seems to have learned painting from the literati painters Kang Sehwang and Sim Sajeong in his teen years, and was recommended by the prominent artist Kim Hiseong to become a court painter at the Royal Bureau of Painting. Kim Hongdo was not a mere court painter performing to the duties of an artisan from a miscellaneous department of the court. Rather, he obtained prominence as a literati-style court painter for bringing the foremost literary theory to his concept of painting: that art’s creativeness is about being naturally inspired from heaven. Kim Hongdo incorporated his theory of art into the arts for cultivation: poetry, calligraphy, painting, and music. He also integrated the concept of delivering both the spirit and likeness of forms in his painting. With these talents Kim was able to become the special artist working solely for the king, and also gained an unparalleled reputation among scholar officials and those of the middle class who were the privileged leaders of art culture. However, owing to the fact that Kim Hongdo had to live as a low official for over ten years in his 30s, 40s and early 50s, his excessive desires for appreciating art as well as his drinking habits brought about poverty and sickness in his later years. Starved and sick at sixty-one years old, Kim Hongdo moved to where his former student and junior court painter Pak Yuseong was a local painter official in Jeolla province in 1805. Kim seems to have passed away one year later.
참고 자료
없음태그
"美術史論壇"의 다른 논문
- ‘優塡王式 불입상’의 형성·복제 그리고 확산28페이지
- 셋슈의 중국회화 인식에 대하여20페이지
- 高麗佛畵의 변죽: 本地, 畵幅, 奉安에 대한 問題31페이지
- 한국 <郭汾陽行樂圖> 연구38페이지
- 초상에 담지 못한 사대부의 삶: 이명기와 김홍도의 <徐直修肖像>26페이지
- 고대 동남아시아의 귀걸이 전통과 그 영향28페이지
- 재조선 일본인 화가 구보타 덴난(久保田天南)과 朝鮮南畵院28페이지
- 김환기의 <종달새 노래할 때>(1935)에서 <항아리와 여인들>(1951)까지24페이지
- 한국 현대미술에 나타난 모성도상의 의미28페이지
- 동아시아 무형문화유산 보호제도와 유네스코 협약26페이지