하임신학의 적합성

저작시기 2012.10 |등록일 2015.12.24 파일확장자어도비 PDF (pdf) | 25페이지 | 가격 6,000원
다운로드
장바구니관심자료
상세신규 배너

* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.

서지정보

발행기관 : 한국기독교학회 수록지정보 : 한국기독교신학논총 / 83권 / 1호
저자명 : 이신형

없음

영어 초록

The purpose of this article is to verify the place of Heim`s theology in the realm of the dialogue between theology and science. That sounds strange to someone who is engaged in the dialogue between theology and science. There are two reasons for this. First is that Heim has no meaning to theologians who participate in the dialogue between theology and science, simply because they are unable to find the relevant idea from him. For them, Heim has an outmoded idea and therefore he has no place to put the working of God within the scientific world. Second, Heim was forgotten in the world of theology even at his time. Even though he was published many books, his theology had no influence on the world of theology at that time. Barth and Bultmann were the main figures for his time. Theology at that time is indebted to Barth and Bultmann, not on Heim. Heim has spread his idea of God throughout Germany and around the world: in that case, we can only find Heim`s influence on the younger generations who were concerned about the faith. Heim was a famous figure for youth who wanted to know the meaning of believing in God, but not for theologians. But, the presumption that Heim had no place in contemporary theology was due to the misconception about his theology. Heim has a unique idea about relating God to the world of science or vice versa. Heim was a pioneer who knew the problem of God in the world of science, and he endeavored to anchor God in the world of science. He had a massive knowledge of physics, and he wrestled with science because science assumed the absolute certainty about reality. Heim thought that science needed to be demythologized, whereas other theologians thought that the Bible needed to be demythologized. I think that the relevance of Heim`s thought for the modern theology lies in his intention that science needs to step down from claiming the ultimatum about how really things are. In other words, theology needs to listen to Heim`s voice and change presumption about science that scientific discovery about nature can change the notion of christian idea of God in order to suit God in the world of science. I do not claim that Heim`s idea of God has no problem at all. For the contrary, his way of presenting the idea of God looks strange to theologians who are at front in the dialogue between theology and science. However, the fact that modern theology is unfamiliar with Heim`s methodology does not give an excuse for ignoring Heim`s voice. Therefore, I will present Heim`s theology in a way that will clarify its place between theology and science.

참고 자료

없음
  • 구매평가(0)
  • 구매문의(0)
      최근 구매한 회원 학교정보 보기
      1. 최근 2주간 다운받은 회원수와 학교정보이며
         구매한 본인의 구매정보도 함께 표시됩니다.
      2. 매시 정각마다 업데이트 됩니다. (02:00 ~ 21:00)
      3. 구매자의 학교정보가 없는 경우 기타로 표시됩니다.
      4. 지식포인트 보유 시 지식포인트가 차감되며
         미보유 시 아이디당 1일 3회만 제공됩니다.

      찾던 자료가 아닌가요?아래 자료들 중 찾던 자료가 있는지 확인해보세요

      상세하단 배너
      우수 콘텐츠 서비스 품질인증 획득
      최근 본 자료더보기
      상세우측 배너
      상세우측 배너
      상세우측 배너
      하임신학의 적합성
      페이지
      만족도 조사

      페이지 사용에 불편하신 점이 있으십니까?

      의견 보내기