무역영어(상공회의소자격시험)11년도 2회 2급 기출및 해설
- 최초 등록일
- 2012.02.17
- 최종 저작일
- 2012.02
- 38페이지/ 한컴오피스
- 가격 2,000원
소개글
무역영어(상공회의소자격시험)11년도 2회 2급 기출및 해설...저작권자인 박기혁샘이 직접 붙인 해설
목차
없음
본문내용
제91회 무역영어2급 - 2011. 9. 25 시행
<제1과목> 영문해석
1. Which of the following has a different stance from the others on the issue discussed below?
From next month, employers are no longer allowed to specify in classified ads that only employed candidates will be considered in several states. A few other states have weighed the idea, and similar legislation has been introduced in Congress. But in most of the country, it is still legal to say, in effect, "unemployed need not apply" ?and to discard a resume because the applicant is not currently working. With the unemployment rate persistently high and 14 million people looking for work, such policies are likely to affect more people than ever before. Should employers be allowed to give preference to candidates who are already working? Or should exclusion based on employment status be illegal?
① Many employers and employment agencies make matters worse by refusing to consider unemployed applicants. This perverse catch-22, limiting jobs to those already working, has exacerbated the unemployment crisis.
② The large number of people who have been unable to find work for long periods of time is troubling. However, prohibiting employers from considering applicants’ employment experience is not the answer.
③ Applicants’ employment status is a poor proxy for their capacity to contribute. People are unemployed for a range of reasons unrelated to merit: perhaps they have gone back to school or perhaps their employer went out of business.
④ Age, race, sex and so forth have nothing to do with one’s ability to work well; the fact that you were cut from your last job might. But to reject a candidate solely on those grounds strikes me as no longer acceptable.
참고 자료
없음