실태조사를 통한 연도별 기관의 안전관리 위원회 구성 및 안전관리자 선임에 관한 비교 연구
(주)코리아스칼라
- 최초 등록일
- 2016.04.02
- 최종 저작일
- 2015.09
- 8페이지/ 어도비 PDF
- 가격 4,000원
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 대한안전경영과학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 대한안전경영과학회지 / 17권 / 3호
ㆍ저자명 : 권윤아, 권영국
목차
1. 서 론
2. 연구 대상 및 방법
2.1 연구 기간 및 대상
2.2 연구 방법
2.3 분석 방법
3. 결 과
3.1 연도별 연구실 안전관리위원회 구성 및개최 차이
3.2 연도별 연구실 안전관리자 선임
3.3 기관 유형별 안전관리위원회 구성과 안전관리자 선임의 비교
4. 결론 및 고찰
6. References
영어 초록
The study is conducted in order to identify whether there is difference in laboratory safety management committee and safety manager appointment for type of institutes(university, research institute, enterprise institute). The study conducted statistical analysis of 2484 institutes (university, research institute, enterprise institute) that attended 'current status of laboratory safety management' by year(number of current status participation).
As a result, university showed increase in forming safety management committee as the number of current status(year) increases. The number of safety management committee held were the highest amongst all institutes being 2 held/ 2 year. Furthermore, period of safety management committee held at university and research institutes are decreasing stately. For 2014, the rate of hosting periodic committee and temporary committee simultaneously when necessary are increasing. The rate of appointing safety manager who is in charge of laboratory safety is increasing in university, but it is decreasing in research institute and enterprise institute. The work pattern of safety manager in university is increase in exclusive duties and decrease in adjunct duties, while work pattern in research institute and enterprise institute is more on the contract duties.
참고 자료
없음
"대한안전경영과학회지"의 다른 논문
더보기 (5/10)