论金沧江的文学批评

서지정보

ㆍ발행기관 : 한국중국문화학회 ㆍ수록지정보 : 중국학논총
ㆍ저자명 : 钱健

목차

绪言：金沧江自身的文学成就
一. 学术界对金沧江的文学评论的既往研究
二. 金沧江文学批评中的价值立场
三. 金沧江文学批评中的品德立场
四. 金沧江文学批评中的艺术立场
五. 金沧江文学批评中的美学立场
结语
【參考文獻】
【中文提要】
【英文提要】
ABSTRACT

한국어 초록

金泽荣沧江先生于1905年挈家小流亡中国后继续从事写作。他在中国的南通出版了所编纂或撰写的书籍共三十余种。其中，有他自己诗文的汇集如《沧江稿》、《韶濩堂集》、《借树亭杂收》等近十种。金沧江的著述是他那一时代的朝鲜文学的最高成就的标志之一。他的造诣很高的浩瀚作品极大地丰富了朝鲜文学的宝库，成了整个朝鲜文化的继续葆有生命力的一部分，也成了世界文学遗产的一部分。我以为他的创作文学的突出成就体现在诗歌、传记文学和散文三大方面。我统计出他已被印行的诗歌有一千零几首，还有散落各处的他的另外一些诗文有待采集。他的传记文学作品则有近百篇，所写的散文的总数也在五百篇左右。学术界对金沧江的文学作品已屡有研究，但是对金沧江的文学评论所作的既往研究还十分罕少，因此本文试图就金沧江的文学批评来加以探讨。本文分别从金沧江文学批评中的价值立场、品德立场、艺术立场、美学立场来分析、理解了他的文学批评的思想、理论、方法并给予了实例。可以把他的判断文学价值的基本立场归结为是一种文道观，其实质就是文道合一论。所谓品德立场，就是金沧江的文学批评不是超然的，不仅仅是就文章而论文章。这正是一种文行观，即金沧江认为只有行高其文才可能真正存良的行高文良论。而艺术立场则主要由金沧江的文理观，即理顺文成论来体现。“理”是“条理”，是文章的结构和论说的井然有序之理，一种逻辑之理；而且还指所写事物时的合理性；所写之文要符合事物的原理，即文章要符合事理。金沧江文学批评中的美学立场是以他的文气观，即气盛文名论为代表的。金沧江解释文章之气有清浊正戾之分；他认为具有起承转合、昂扬顿挫，而致生动的气韵声势的文章及有神气的文章才可被评判为善文。金沧江的文学批评观是在研评了韩国和中国历代的约百位文学家的作品，乃至于其人生的基础上，以及在总结自己的文学实践之后才形成的。他的文学批评的思想、立场、理论、方法等等是朝鲜民族文学的宝贵财富。其文学批评所包蕴的理性、正义、丰富的情感和高度的艺术技巧等等至今仍然闪耀着光彩，对我们仍有着深长的启发和教诲的意义，很值得我们不断地学习和领悟。

영어 초록

This thesis including two works: a paper text and a slide group Each of them is independent, but the main structures and views of the both are the same. The outline of them is as follows:
Introduction: the literary achievements of Kim Chang-gang
I. The previous studies within the academic circle into Kim Chang-gang’s literary criticism
II. The position reflecting the truth of Kim Chang-gang’s literary criticism
III. The moral position for Kim Chang-gang’s literary criticism
IV. The coherence, reason and logic in perspective (the position of artistic view) of Kim Chang-gang’s literary criticism
V. The aesthetics in perspective (the position of the enthusiasm and interest momentum) for Kim Chang-gang’s literary criticism Conclusion
After Mr. Kim Chang-gang’s exile in China pulled his family members in 1905, more than thirty books and collections were written or compiled by Kim Chang-gang himself were published in
China. Of these, there were about a dozen books of his poetry anthologies and essays such as the collections under the titles of Chang-gang’s Draft, Corpus of Shaohu Hall, Miscellanea at Pavilion by Tree and others. Kim Chang-gang’s writing was one of the marks of the highest achievements of Korean literature that era. His vast works of very high attainments greatly enriched the treasure house of Korean literature, has also become the part, which continues to maintain its vitality, of the world's literary heritage. I thought that his outstanding achievement in creative literature is expressed in three main areas: writing of poem, prose and biography. I figure that a thousand and a few poems of him have been published, there are a small number of his poems have scattered in some places. There are nearly one hundred biographies and around five hundred essays, both of them written by him. Kim Chang-gang’s literary criticism has been concerned about very rarely though his creative literature has been continually studied in the academic circle. This article attempts to understand his literary criticism by exploring and analyzing the ideas, theories and methods of his literary criticism in perspectives of the value, art and aesthetic with examples. We could attribute his basic perspective judging the literary value to a theory of literature plus truth which essence is a view of integration of text and truth. The so-called moral perspectives namely the moral position that literary criticism, is not detached, in Kim Chang-gang’s vision, the literary works in high quality and health could be produced only by man whom keeps noble behaviors and lofty ideas. The coherence, reason and logic in perspective (the position of artistic view) of Kim Chang-gang’s literary criticism is introduced and discussed in this thesis as well as the aesthetics in perspective, the position of the enthusiasm and interest momentum, for Kim Chang-gang’s literary criticism. Kim Chang-gang’s literary criticism outlook was just formed after his study and assessment of the works written by more than a hundred Korean and Chinese literati and built on the basis of his own life experience including his literary practice. The ideas, positions, theories, methods of his literary criticism are the very precious treasure of Korean national literary. The reason, justice, the rich emotion, highly artistic skills and so on within his literary criticism have been still shining glory, and still giving us a deep sense of inspiration and teaching that for us is continually worth to learn and comprehend.

참고 자료

없음