고층고밀 아파트단지의 노후도 평가지표 개발

서지정보

ㆍ발행기관 : 한국주거학회 ㆍ수록지정보 : 한국주거학회논문집 / 20권 / 4호
ㆍ저자명 : 조성희, 이태경

목차

I. 서 론
II. 아파트단지 노후도 평가의 개념설정
III. 아파트단지 노후도 평가항목 개발
IV. 아파트단지 노후도 평가지표의 척도개발
V. 아파트단지 노후도 평가지표의 가중치개발
VI. 결 론
참고문헌

한국어 초록

본 연구의 목적은 고층고밀 아파트단지의 지속가능한 재생방안을 모색하기 위해 아파트단지의 노후도를 속가능한 재생의 관점에서 포괄적으로 진단할 수 있는 아파트노후도 평가지표를 개발하려는 것이다. 이를 위해 평가지표의 체계를 설정하고 평가항목과 평가척도를 제안하였으며, 그를 바탕으로 평가항목에 대한 가중치를 산출함으로써 항목간의 중요도가 반영된 아파트노후도 평가지표로 개발하였다. 이는 우리나라 고층고밀 아파트단지의 노후특성을 파악할 수 있는 평가도구로서의 의의를 가지며, 평가결과는 지속가능한 재생의 방향을 모색하는 지침으로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

영어 초록

High-rise and high-density apartment complexes have been built and supplied on a large scale in the 1st period of the New Town project in metropolitan areas since the late 1980s. Now It has become necessary to improve those apartment complexes, which have serious deterioration problems for aging more than about 20 years accompanying simultaneity and a large scale. The purpose of this research is to develop the evaluating indicators to measure the level of deterioration of apartments inclusively and practically in order to regenerate apartments as sustainable residential environments. This study is composed of the following four parts; (a) establishing the conceptual model of evaluation of apartment deterioration, (b) selecting evaluation items, (c) constituting evaluation measurement, and（ｄ)weighting evaluation indicators. First, deterioration of apartments was conceptualized by physical. social, and economical aspects in terms of ustainable development and proposed the conceptual model of hierarchy structure of evaluation of apartment deterioration by literature reviews. Second, evaluating items were selected based on literature reviews of existing indicators and preceding studies about apartments of Korea and foreign countries. The evaluating indicators were identified as a total of 77 evaluating items which were composed of three dimensions and 9 attributes on the basis of the conceptual model. They cover comprehensive scope of the apartment such as unit, building, complex, and site. Third, as the measurement, the 5 point ordinal scale measure was suggested. The evaluating measurement including measure standards, measure methods, and measure contents were developed by each evaluating items. Lastly, the weighting of evaluating indicators was analyzed by AHP method conducted by survey on the expert group. Items were identified as high contributors or low contributors. The weighting of these items could suggest several evaluations according to the situation. The evaluation of the level of deterioration can be done by both total evaluation and a specific field of evaluation. In addition, it is easy to grasp deteriorated attributes or dimensions by providing a radar and bar chart showing evaluation results. These evaluating indicators could be a useful tool to grasp actual methods for the regeneration of apartments.

참고 자료

없음