위안부 사건, 한국과 일본의 서로 다른 접근 - 문화 기억과 역사의 경쟁

목차

I. Introduction

II. Contested Relationship: Memory and History

III. Representation: Unforgettable Memory vs. Great History
a. Comfort Women Statue before the South Korea-Japan Agreement
b. Comfort Women Statue after the South Korea-Japan Agreement

IV. Conclusion

References

본문내용

I. Introduction
History is a means by which to document and pass on the events of the past. History is not only a task which aims to reveal past facts, but also to generate a composite image of the past from cultural, economic, and political indicators, something which can cause divergent opinions and conflicts. Some researchers believe that history and memory have a complementary relationship. However, history and memory can sometimes seem to be antithetical of one another, particularly with regard to countries having different interpretations of the same historical event.
The dispute over so-called ‘comfort women’ is one typical case. The term ‘comfort women’ is a euphemism referring to women forced into sexual slavery by the forces of the Empire of Japan during World War II. According to data collected, comfort stations were established in the name of reducing sexual assault cases and venereal disease, and aimed at local residents in occupied territories.

참고 자료

Assmann, J. (2011), Cultural memories. Springer.
Brett, S., Bickford, L., and Rios, M. (2007) ‘Memorialization and democracy: state policy and civic action’, The international conference of memorialization and democracy, Santiago, Chile, 20-27 June. Available at: http: /http://www.sitesofconscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Members_member-Benefits_004.pdf.
Carr, E. (1961) What is history? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gurler, E. and Ozer, B. (2012) ‘The effects of public memorials on social memory and urban identity’, Proceedings of the 1st world conference on psychology and sociology, Antalya, Turkey, 28 – 1 December. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.361
Halbwachs, M. (1992) On collective memory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Han, J. (2008), ‘Memory as commodity’, Review of history (Spring), pp.374-395).
Haysashi, H. (2008), ‘Disputes in Japan over the Japanese military “Comfort Women” system and its perception in history’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 617(5), pp.123-132.
Jeon, J. (2005). History tells memory. Seoul: Humanist.
Lowenthal, D. (1985) The past is a foreign country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nora, P. (1989) ‘Between memory and history: Les Lieux de Mémoire’, University of California Press.
Soh, C. (2000) ‘From imperial gifts to sex slaves: Theorizing symbolic representation of the comfort women’, Social Science Japan Journal, 3(1), pp.565-578.
Sturken, M. (1997). Tangled memories: The Vietnam war, the AIDS epidemic, and the politics of remembering. California: University of California Press.
Hall, S (1996) Critical dialogues in cultural studies. London: Routledge.
Tae, J. (2012) The study of the process of social memory through media representation. PhD thesis. Sogang University.
Tae, J. (2014) The study of the memory culture. Seoul: Communication Books.
The Last Judgement (2015) SBS, 16 August.
The Wall Street Journal (2015) ‘Full text: Japan-South Korea statement on ‘comfort women’, 28 December. Available at: http://blogs.wsj.com/japamrealtime/2015/12/28/full-text-japan-south-korea-statement-on-comfort-women.
Thompson, P. (2000) The voice of the past: Oral history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yoshimi, Y. (2002) Comfort women. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
Young. J. (1993) The texture of memory, New Haven: Yale University Press.