[영문수필] 마이크로소프트

등록일 2003.04.17 MS 워드 (doc) | 9페이지 | 가격 1,000원

소개글

ms사의 독과점을 증명하는데에 촛점을 맞춘 영문 에세이 입니다.

목차

없음

본문내용

What is a monopoly? The focus of this essay is to answer that very question and will use the Microsoft monopoly trials as case examples. The report will also examine relative Federal laws, its consequences, the nature of Microsoft, and finally practical resolutions. According to the Webster’s Dictionary a monopoly is "The exclusive control of a commodity or service in a given market."1
There are 2 predominate models in a monopoly. The first one is a “pure monopoly” which "there is only one supplier of a product for which there are no close substitutes, and in which it is very hard for another firm to coexist."2 Second model is a “natural monopoly” where "advantages of large-scale production make it possible for a single firm to produce the entire output of the market at lower average cost than a number of firms each producing a smaller quantity."3

참고 자료

1. Neufeldt, Victoria, Editor in Chief. Webster's New World Dictionary, Third College Edition. New York: Webster’s New World, 1988.
2. Baumol, William J. and Alan S. Blinder. Economics: Principles and Policy, Sixth Edition. Forth Worth, etc.: Dryden Press, 1994.
3.Baumol, William J. and Alan S. Blinder. Economics: Principles and Policy, Sixth Edition. Forth Worth, etc.: Dryden Press, 1994.
4. US Code, Title 15, Chapter 1, The Sherman Act, Cornell University Law School, http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/ch1.html.
5. US Code, Title 15, Chapter 1, Section 2. The Sherman Act, Section 2. As listed on Cornell University Law School website, at http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/2.html.
6. US Code, Title 15, Chapter 1, Section 1. The Sherman Act, Section 1. As listed on Cornell University Law School website, at http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/1.html.
7. US Code, Title 15, Chapter 1, Section 1. The Sherman Act, Section 1. Cornell University Law School, http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/1.html.
8. US Code, Title 15, Chapter 1, Section 2. The Sherman Act, Section 2. Cornell, University Law School, http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/2.html.
9. US Code, Title 15, Chapter 1, Section 2. The Sherman Act, Section 2. Cornell, University Law School, http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/2.html.
10. US Code, Title 15, Chapter 1, Section 16. The Tunney Act, Section 2. Cornell, University Law School, http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/16.html
11. Gleik, James. "Making Microsoft Safe for Capitalism." New York Times Magazine, November 5, 1995, http://www.around.com/microsoft.html
12. Gleik, James. "Making Microsoft Safe for Capitalism." New York Times Magazine, November 5, 1995, http://www.around.com/microsoft.html
13. The Department of Justice vs. Microsoft. Stanford University. http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~kkoster/microsoft/antitrust.html.
14. The Department of Justice vs. Microsoft. Stanford University. http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~kkoster/microsoft/antitrust.html.
15. US Code, Title 15, Chapter 1, Section 16. The Tunney Act, Section 16. As listed on Cornell University Law School website, at http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/16.html.
16. Sporkin, Stanley. Ruling Decision, United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation, Civil Action No. 94-1564. Decided February 14, 1995. Was previously located at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/Owen/froeb/antitrust/cas
      최근 구매한 회원 학교정보 보기
      1. 최근 2주간 다운받은 회원수와 학교정보이며
         구매한 본인의 구매정보도 함께 표시됩니다.
      2. 매시 정각마다 업데이트 됩니다. (02:00 ~ 21:00)
      3. 구매자의 학교정보가 없는 경우 기타로 표시됩니다.
      최근 본 자료더보기
      추천도서