[사회] Affirmative action should be continued.(research argument)

소개글

affirmative action 에 대한 researched argument 입니다. affirmative action 에 대해 찬성하는 입장이고 MLA format 을 정확히 지키고 있습니다. works cited 와 bibliography 가 포함되어 있습니다.

목차

없음

본문내용

Even though affirmative action is controversial because it seeks to remedy inequalities by means of unequal treatment, affirmative action may be regarded as a channel to realize the full integration of American society. As affirmative action brings about greater equality among groups, social tension is reduced and the prospects of speedy social or national integration would increase, assimilating previously excluded groups into the mainstream of society. Controversial issues of affirmative action (reparation, reverse discrimination, and diversity issues), and achievements of affirmative action will be covered in this paper.

참고 자료

Bayles, Michael D. “Reparations to Wronged Groups” The affirmative action debate. Ed. Steven M. Cahn. New York: Routledge, 1995. 15-17.
Blauner, Bob. Black Lives, White Lives: Three Decades of Race Relations in America. University of California Press, 2000.
Brest, Paul, and Miranda Oshige. Affirmative Action for Whom?, 47 Stan. L. Rev. 855, 1995.
Citizens' Commission on Civil Rights. Affirmative action to open the doors of job opportunity. Washington, DC,1984.
Graubard, Stephen. “An American Dilemma Revisited.” An American Dilemma Revisited. Ed. Obie Clayton. Russell Sage Foundation, 1996. 20.
Gurin, Patricia. “New Research on The Benefits of Diversity in College and Beyond: An Empirical Analysis” Diversity Digest. 12 Nov. 2002. < http://www.diversityweb.org/Digest/Sp99/benefits.html>
Kang, Jerry. The Future of Affirmative Action in Higher Education. CrossCurrents, 1996 Spring.
Massey, Douglas and Nancy Denton. American Apartheid. Harvard University Press, 1993.
Murrell, A. J., & Jones, R. “The paradox of affirmative action: Examining its impact and future for women and minorities in employment.” Manuscript submitted for publication. Reported in “Affirmative Action: Who Benefits” APA Online 12 Nov. 2002. < http://www.apa.org/pubinfo/affirmaction.html>
Newton, Lisa H. “Reverse Discrimination as Unjustified” The affirmative action debate. Ed. Steven M. Cahn. New York: Routledge, 1995. 115-20.
Nickel, James W. “Discrimination and Morally Relevant Characteristics.” The affirmative action debate. Ed. Steven M. Cahn. New York: Routledge, 1995. 3-4.
Park, Jisung. The U. S. Affirmative Action Debate. Seoul: Seoul National University, 2000.
Post, Robert, and Michael Rogin. Race and representation : affirmative action. New York :Zone Books, 1998.
Taylor, Paul W. “Reverse Discrimination and Compensatory Justice” The affirmative action debate. Ed. Steven M. Cahn. New York: Routledge, 1995. 9-14.
U. S. Department Labor. “Women in the Work Force.” 1993 Handbook on Women Workers: trends & issues Washington, D.C.: Women’s Bureau, 1994: 6.
Wolf, Celia. “Proportional Representation of Women and Minirities” The affirmative action debate. Ed. Steven M. Cahn. New York: Routledge, 1995. 135-42.
Woodruff, Paul. “What’s Wrong with Discrimination?” The affirmative action debate. Ed. Steven M. Cahn. New York: Routledge, 1995. 39-42.